On 5/26/23 18:43, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> If R2519, how do we apply the full definition? For instance, how do we
> apply the "the action is taken as part of a promise which e created"
> clause? Consider "I become a signatory to the rice plan". Maybe that
> works instantaneously, bu
On 5/26/23 18:06, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 11:39 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 11:18 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On 5/26/23 14:14, Kerim Aydin via agora-disc
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 11:39 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 11:18 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> >
> > On 5/26/23 14:14, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 11:01 AM Janet Cobb
On 5/26/23 14:01, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Let's break down the statement: "A Rice Plan has an active player's
>> Signature as long as that player is consenting to it." What is "it" in this
>> situation? Is "it" an action or non-action?
>> This can be read a few ways: the first way
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 11:18 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On 5/26/23 14:14, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 11:01 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> >>> Now, it is sufficient to determine whether "that Rice Plan having that
> >>> p
On 5/26/23 14:14, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 11:01 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>>> Now, it is sufficient to determine whether "that Rice Plan having that
>>> player's Signature" is an action or not. I'd say that it is a regulated
>>> action, f
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 11:01 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> > Now, it is sufficient to determine whether "that Rice Plan having that
> > player's Signature" is an action or not. I'd say that it is a regulated
> > action, fitting all three criteria for regulated actions: the rules hav
On 5/26/23 13:46, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 9:03 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 4:37 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-official <
>> agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>>
>>> [Apolo
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 9:03 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 4:37 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-official <
> agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > [Apologies for not waiting for more input from the Caller, but if I
> > don
On 5/26/23 12:01, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> Given that the ricemastor was the one who brought this case to light,
> without evidence, hopefully this is sufficient detail on the case.
> Otherwise, this is a draft that will come to be the ruling I deploy
> sometime, so be sure to s
On 5/26/23 12:01, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 4:37 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-official <
> agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> [Apologies for not waiting for more input from the Caller, but if I
>> don't assign this now it may be nearly a week before I
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 4:37 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-official <
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> [Apologies for not waiting for more input from the Caller, but if I
> don't assign this now it may be nearly a week before I can. Hopefully
> Yachay can still provide something timely, or Judg
12 matches
Mail list logo
