On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Elliott Hird <
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 2009-04-13, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Sgeo wrote:
> >
> >> > WATCHERS (3)
> >> >
> >> > Nickn
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Sgeo wrote:
> > WATCHERS (3)
> >
> > Nickname E-mail address Requested
> >
>
> > Davedavidni...@gmail.com 06 Jan 03
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 14:40 -0400, comex wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > > I call for judgement on the statement "agora-business is a public
> > > forum".
> > >
> > > Arguments:
> > > a-b has been down twice
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 20:40 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> > > Registrar's Census
> > I intend, without objection, to ratify the most recently published
> > Registrar's rep
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 23:39 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> > Given that http://irc.freenode.net:6667/#%23nomic is no longer
> > accessible, it will no longer be considered a forum.
>
> It is accessible; and forums don&#x
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Sean Hunt wrote:
> > Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> >> Registrar's Census
> > I intend, without objection, to ratify the most recently published
> > Registrar's report (as of the time I perform the action) prov
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:29 AM, comex wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Geoffrey Spear
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> >> I deputize for the IADoP to initiate an Agoran Decision to choose the
> >> holder of th
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> > Given that http://irc.freenode.net:6667/#%23nomic is no longer
> > accessible, it will no longer be considered a forum.
> >
> > -Yally
> It is ##nomic, not #%23nomic. It is accessible; I
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> comex wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> >> I deputize for the IADoP to initiate an Agoran Decision to choose the
> >> holder of the Registrar office. The eligible voters ar
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2443
>
> == CFJ 2443 ==
>
>CFJ 2423 is a tortoise.
>
> ===
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Flight Schedule
>
> Date of this report: Tue 7 Apr 09
> Date of last report: Mon 23 Feb 09
> (All times are UTC)
>
>
> Recent events
> -
> Tue 3 Feb 21:24:41 Murphy: Wooble> comex (OVER 9000)
> Thu 5 Feb 00:50:23 Os
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Warrigal
> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Luke Benner
> wrote:
> > I am requesting to join Agora. The name I will be writing under will be
> > Randy Olshaw.
>
> Lessee, by Rule 217, "to join Agora" is the same as "to register", so
> you're requesting r
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> > I CFJ on the following statement: An officer CAN submit an attachment in
> > lieu of a plain text email to satisfy his report provided the attachment
> in
>
>
> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:00:43 -0700
> From: Ed Murphy
> To: Agora Business
> Subject: BUS: Spring cleaning, take two
> Reply-To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
>
> Without objection, I intend to make pikhq inactive.
> Without objection, I intend to make Sgeo inactive.
> Without objection,
> I accept both of my nominations, but I would actually prefer to not
> get them, at least not more than one. Don't think I'm ready for that
> much yet...
>
>
> --
> -Tiger
>
You were never nominated for IADOP, only for Herald.
-Yally
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> > I vote as follows:
> >
> > 6187: AGAINST [the formula is broken for several instances, including
> > especially if the number of active players is very low)
> > 6188: PRESENT
> >
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote=
> :
> > The nomination periods for scorekeepor and Grand Poobah have ended.
> > I hereby initiate two Agoran Decisions, each identified by its Office.
> > The eligible voters for each decision are the active players and the
> > vote collector
As hard as I'm trying, I can't see anything illegal about this scam. Well
done. Very clever.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Taral wrote:
> I'm sorry folks... I'm kinda overloaded IRL. Can someone pick up the
> Registrar and Scorekeepor offices? I'd really appreciate it.
>
> --
> Taral
> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
>-- Unknown
>
I initiate
Getting a little off topic here... Internomic gives two weeks to respond to
all submitted proposals. Don't you think the ambassador should instead be
required to submit all of Internomic's proposals for voting so that the
general Agoran population can participate in each Internomic decision?
-Yall
Welcome to Agora.
-Yally
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> 2009/3/23 Alex Smith :
> > On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 19:35 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> >> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> >> wrote:
> >> 2009/3/22 Alex Smith :
> >&g
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> 2009/3/22 Alex Smith :
> > On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 23:06 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> >> The following proposal is made as a part of the Anarchist's weekly
> >> duties.
> >> Date of this message: Sun 22 Mar 09
> >> Date of last fulfilment
I researched this Fresh Nomic a little bit and I've found that they have
exactly one member who is literally playing nomic by himself.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > The Anarchist is a low-priority office; its holder is responsible for
> > proposing the repeal of rules.
>
> Leaves weekly duties, so making it low-priority would have no
> appreciable effect.
>
Except the office wouldn't need to be fill
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Warrigal
> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > The provision about rests is unnecessary; as the Agora Corporation is a
> > second-class person.
>
> Indeed. Let's make it "Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, the
> voting limit of Ag
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Ed Murphy wrote:
> > Yally wrote:
> >
> >> 6147 O 1 1.0 coppro Report Accessibility
> >> AGAINST
> >
> > Ineffective, your caste is still Savage.
>
> According to the most recent report issued by the Grand Poobah, only
> ais523 has
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
6140 D 1 2.0 Goethe reward contest activity
FOR
6141 D 1 3.0 coppro Fix 754
FOR
6142 D 1 3.0 coppro Better SHOULD fix
PRESENT
6143 D 0 2.0 Tiger Subsidy Anarchy
FOR
6144 D 1 3.0 Wooble Faster De
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 09:37 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >> Oh, so you're interpreting R2150 as "must include". Again, though, this
> >> is trivially satisfied by your theoretical ability to hire one or more
> >> sufficiently c
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Sgeo wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> > Proposal: Removing Unqualified Senators (AI = 2, II = 1) {
> >
> > Amend rule 2177 (The Senate) by adding the following text as a separate
> > pa
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 13:33 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > Proposal: Support Plutocracy
> > (AI = 2, please)
> >
> > Create a rule titled "Support Plutocracy" with Power 2 and this text:
> >
> > A player CAN, with 4 support, change a democr
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
6120 D 1 2.0 Murphy Increase the ticket ration
FOR
-Yally
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Sgeo wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Warrigal
> > >
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Aaron Goldfein &l
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Warrigal
> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> > Proposal: Protect Our Rights (AI = 4)
> >
> > Increase the power of Rule 101 (The Rights of Agorans) from power 3 to
> power
> > 4.
> >
>
>
>
> chamber: O = Ordinary; D = Democratic
> interest: 0-3 = interest index
>
> Proposal ID numbers:
> highest orderly: 6115
> disorderly: none
>
> Proposal pool: empty
>
> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
>
> Proposal 6109 (Democratic, AI=3.0, Inter
Hey, what about me? I'm not listed as a player.
-Yally
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 7:38 PM, comex wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> > Create a new rule entitle "Correction of Proposal Response Typos" with
> power
> > = 1 and the text:
> >
> > If in response to a proposal distr
Proposal: Correction of Typos
(AI = 1, II = 1)
Create a new rule entitle "Correction of Proposal Response Typos" with power
= 1 and the text:
If in response to a proposal distribution an eligible voter submits a
non-legal response that clearly and obviously resembles an acceptable
response (AGAN
I support both as well.
-Yally
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:56 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > comex wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Charles Reiss
> wrote:
> > >> GUILTY / APOLOGY (empty set).
> > >> GUILTY / APOLOGY - exception, b
Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:36 PM, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> > I have been browsing the FLR and do not seems to fully understand the
> > adoption indexes of proposals. Aside from maintenance proposals (which
> have
I have been browsing the FLR and do not seems to fully understand the
adoption indexes of proposals. Aside from maintenance proposals (which have
an AI of 1), are adoption indexes arbitrary?
-Yally
>
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 08:38:44 -0500
> From: Geoffrey Spear
> To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
> Subject: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration
> Reply-To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
>
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>
501 - 542 of 542 matches
Mail list logo
