used as a basis for a thesis:
http://codepad.org/GSBJPlPg
--
C-walker (Charles Walker)
after a delay in which the
proposer was down a card, which sounds about right to me.
II + 1 sounds right. Want to propose that?
--
C-walker (Charles Walker)
:
Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:12 - C-Walker is dealt the following card from the
deck of Justice: Absolv-o-Matic
I believe I am owed two more Justice cards, one for the case which was
recently remanded to woggle, and one for the inquiry case which I just
judged.
--
C-walker (Charles Walker)
judged.
Appeal cases don't generate draws. Here's the DoJ draws I show you
having earned recently:
Sat, 08 Aug 2009 16:59 - C-Walker has earned 1 draw from the deck of
Justice for CFJ 2646
Sun, 16 Aug 2009 20:15 - C-Walker has earned 1 draw from the deck of
Justice for CFJ 2644
Am I missing
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Roger Hickspidge...@gmail.com wrote:
No, that's everything. I seem to have been dealt only one of the above
draws, though.
Here's the records that correspond to those earned draws:
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:25 - C-Walker is dealt the following card from the
deck
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
c-walker wrote:
CFJ, II 3: When a Rule is repealed, its Power is set to 0.
Gratuitous: No, the rule simply ceases to exist.
I doesn't matter, I retracted the CFJ. They may be some upcoming scams
related to this, though
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:22 PM,
C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
chamber: ordinary
ai: 1.0
interest: 1
proposer: C-walker
coauthors: Wooble
title: Livenomic Recognition
submit_date: 2009-07-28
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
C-walker wrote:
I change my salary to 'Change, Change, Government, Government'.
Is anyone willing to trade any of my Justice cards for Change or
Government cards? My Justice card holdings are as follows:
Absolv-o-Matic
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 5:34 PM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
C-walker wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
C-walker wrote:
I change my salary to 'Change, Change, Government, Government
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 5:49 PM, C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 5:34 PM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
C-walker wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
C
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
C-walker wrote:
I become active.
It looks like I missed an interesting week!
Can someone tell me how the Absolv-o-matic thing ended? Do I still have a
rest?
I believe so, but you still have a card.
Ok, thanks
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Pavitracelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
I submit the following proposal, II=1, AI=4, Sleeping Cthulhu:
{
Create a new rule, entitled Great Cthulhu, with the following text:
This doesn't set the power of the new rule, so it defaults to 1.
--
C-walker
you have presented. Maybe
you should include this and your Losing Condition idea?
--
C-walker
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:51 PM, ais523callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 13:14 +0100, C-walker wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:47 PM,
C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
I intend, without party objection, to terminate the Pledge which has
no name
for, then change that vote to against.
--
C-walker
contact the President about that?
--
C-walker
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:52 PM, ais523callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 20:47 +0100, C-walker wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:43 PM, ais523callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 15:22 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
No one submitted a guess within
find relevant links at http://www.agoranomic.org/
--
C-walker
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:43 PM, BobTHJ wrote:
rough proto to solicit comments:
Deck of Business
Thoughts?
How are the cards supposed to be earned?
--
C-walker
to the best of my knowledge at the time of a Notary
report).
CoE or whatever: The NotaryWiki doesn't list me as a party to the FRC.
You can correct it yourself if you have an account on the site. You
might need a password though; I think this is in the Notary report.
--
C-walker
G. wrote:
I submit the following proposal, fix ancient cards, AI-2, II-0.
Rule 2260 (The Deck of Government) by replacing Vote Power with
voting limit where it appears in the rule.
You might need an 'Amend' there.
--
C-walker
to forget every intent I make. :/
--
C-walker
and other things that represent a contribution to Agora such as
offices?
--
C-walker
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 8:32 PM, G. wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, C-walker wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 7:27 PM, G. wrote:
3. Some form of monthly rotation.
Again, this is not much different from the current system. Have you
any specific ideas for a different form of monthly rotation
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Elliott
Hirdpenguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/7/20 C-walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com:
Luckily for you, ehird, you won't have to recordkeep any of this.
Gee, I apologise for pointing it out.
I didn't mind that, it was the the recordkeeping
message wasn't showing up then). Any one of you scammers used
to work for the Nixon administration by any chance? :)
If it wasn't the scammers, it was probably loggic (the ##nomic logbot)
crashing. Ais523 emself admits to its random crashes.
--
C-walker
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, without 3 objections, to distribute 'Office IIs with Agoran
Consent'. (allows office II changes w/ 2 support
Should be 'without 2 objections'. Otherwise, thanks for the intent.
--
C-walker
Statements made
Distributable before the Ambassador attempts to recognise the EUDI, if
e does so.
--
C-walker
be unfair to ais523 ehird as they both have a lot more
credits than markers.)
I suggest a proposal which creates and destroys cards as appropriate
using the conversion rate the cards proposal used, or creating a Card
Exchange in which ais523 and ehird already have some card credits.
--
C-walker
some in their place to balance things out.
Any comments? Is this a good idea? Have I outlined good ideas for
Medals? Should there be one for amending R101- R107? Especially R104.
In fact, there should probably be a win for doing that without a scam.
Anyway... comments?
--
C-walker
for a different name?
--
C-walker
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 4:37 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 5, 2009, at 9:54 AM, C-walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Contract Cleanup (AI = 2, II = 0)
Terminate each non-pledge Public contract which does not contain the
string inferences.
Wait, what!?
Sorry, I
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Charles Reiss woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/5/09 6:54 AM, C-walker wrote:
[snip]
I submit the following proposal:
{{
Contract Cleanup (AI = 2, II = 0)
Terminate each non-pledge Public contract which does not contain the
string inferences
contracts terminated by proposal to ones where there is
a little bit of controversy on deadness).
I guess. H. Notary, are you planning to do something like this soon? I
mean, it's your problem mostly.
--
C-walker
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, July 5, 2009, C-walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Charles Reisswoggl...@gmail.com wrote:
I would prefer the contracts to be terminated to be explicitly
enumerated in any
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Jonatan
Kilhamnjonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
But is it a good idea?
As one of several players with effectively no assets, it sounds like a
great idea ;).
--
C-walker
, at 5:31 PM, to be exact. I CoE that this proposal should
be listed as distributable.
You have a precise memory!
Or an effective Gmail labeling system, I'm not sure which :P.
--
C-walker
Murphy wrote:
Guesses for June 22-28 Proposals CFJs
---
Tue 16 Jun 16:35:58 c. 15 15
Sun 21 Jun 08:50:09 c-walker 16 9
Sun 21 Jun 08:54:13 Yally 8 12
* 4 x-points to c-walker
* 8 y
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 18:42 +0100, C-walker wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, Wooble wrote:
Happy Birthday, Agora!
I thought we went by UTC time? Anyway, Happy Birthday, Agora!
We do for almost everything, the Birthday's
.
and/or make the recordkeepor miss your action, causing em to violate
the rules when publishing eir report, for which they'll take revenge
by keeping your caste at Savage forever.
Am I supposed to be laughing or crying now?
--
C-walker
who won't be trying that again
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Craig Danielteu...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
I change my name to 2.71828183... or e for short.
I'll accept
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
I change my name to 2.71828183... or e for short.
I'll accept 2.71828..., but don't you think picking the third-person
singular
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
Also gains of most ribbons and some Notes would go to me.
*sigh* see CFJ 1520, last two paragraphs of judge's arguments, please.
-G.
I said /would/, not really thinking
H. Herald, please direct me to your last report. I am looking in
relation to a proposal I am writing for B. Thanks in advance.
--
C-walker
Just a note to all interested parties: A proposal passed in InterNomic
recently that makes it eligible to be an Agoran Protectorate, Ais523
can now make it one without 3 objections.
--
C-walker
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
Replace the text of rule 2126 with the following, and rename it Cards:
I suggest repealing 2126 and creating a new rule in its place.
Otherwise I like it.
--
C-walker
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 16:39 +0100, C-walker wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:24 AM,
C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote
in Agoran decisions
regarding proposals.
A contract that grants an attorney Specific Powers of Attorney allows
the attorney to act on behalf of the attornor to perform any actions
that the contract allows.
}}
}
--
C-walker
comex wrote:
C-walker wrote:
When a player (the attorney) acts on behalf of another player to
perform an action, that action is performed as if the attorney is the
player e is acting on behalf of.
Bad idea-- see CFJ 1895.
I guess I agree, and if act on behalf works already then this isn't
GMT
Assigned to c-walker: (as of this message)
I am supine as of 17th June.
--
C-walker
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.comwrote:
Promotor's Pool Report
There seems to be two identical proposals submitted by me in there. Did I
submit it twice or is it a mistake?
--
C-walker
Murphy wrote:
Endorsement and denouncement were amended to carry an implicit
PRESENT if it would otherwise fail to evaluate to a valid option,
but this does not apply to conditional votes in general, nor to
ordered lists of election candidates in particular.
Any reason why not?
--
C-walker
.
G. protos the return of CFJ dismissal.
Ais523 supposedly acts on behalf of myndzi to register em.
Yally tries to make Siege inactive, Siege objects and says e is
planning to vote.
Allispaul submits CFJ regarding contract definitions.
17th: C-walker is assigned to CFJ
Murphy wrote:
c-walker wrote:
Would anyone with an existing
Agora-related site be interested in hosting this if I took it up
permanently?
I'll host whatever is published along these lines. I do have
a bunch of old messages saved up with the theoretical intent
of publishing back issues
.}
{myndzi is not a player.}
Either document may be ratified at a later date, this allows any
ambiguity that arises to be dealt with retroactively.
{myndzi has registered.}
{myndzi has not registered.}
--
C-walker
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I recuse c-walker from CFJ 2547.
When was I assigned to this? I can't seem to find it.
--
C-walker, who intends, without objection
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
c-walker wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I recuse c-walker from CFJ 2547.
When was I assigned to this? I can't seem to find it.
June 6.
Ah, I've found it now. Third Judge
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
It can. Power-3 and higher entities are not restricted in actions.
I intend, without objection, to make the change described in c-walker's
proposal.
You have a few days left to do this.
--
C-walker, who intends, without
to be the
title then? In future I will add titles in the body of the message.
--
C-walker
it distributable as a
reward for submitting it to review.
}
--
C-walker, who intends, without objection
60 matches
Mail list logo
