This is the ruleset for a game called "Dummy Pseudonomic"
The ruleset for Dummy Psuedonomic has no effect on the gamestate, which is
always empty.
The ruleset for Dummy Pseudonomic is not binding on anyone, including
players.
People may register for Dummy Pseudonomic by thinking to themselves that
My listed birthday should be 27 Jun 08 if I understand "birthday"
correctly.
My first registration is listed as "a Sgeo sgeoster at
gmail.com27 Jun 08 31 Jul 11"
The link to https://agoranomic.org/Registrar/Reports/ appears to be an
older link, and should be to https://agoranomic.org/Registrar/
Was looking through my email archives for LambdaMOO stuff, and saw
something about an Agoran MOO that used to exist. Is the database for that
available anywhere? I would love to explore it and see what people made,
even if it's otherwise dead.
What's going on with BlogNomic?
http://blognomic.com/archive/twelve_times_twelve_midnight
Is this just the new theme, risking BlogNomic's existence?
This doesn't seem like it addresses the issue of Ambassador Abuse, although
it wasn't mentioned in the CfJ itself. As far as I can tell, if Ambassador
Abuse works, it would be required to be at the same time, and is there any
reason that same time != same message?
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:41 PM,
A communication to Ambassador Abuse: I change rule 5 to read 'Ambabusese is
a strange language: If Agora would interpret the Ambabusese as transferring
or awarding a number of Yaks, but failing to transfer or award Yaks such
that both Sgeo and woggle gain at least 3000 Yaks in the week
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.comwrote:
I submit the following proposals:
{
Exile too harsh, AI 2, disinterested
Amend Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by removing the text and CANNOT
register for two months after that time.
[ EXILED players still won't
I support.
On Jun 28, 2013 12:37 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Jonathan Rouillard
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to flip Ambassador Abuse's recognition
to Hostile. I also warn Ambassador Abuse that
, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 23:32 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
1. This is the ruleset of a nomic called Ambassador Abuse
2. There are two languages used by Ambassador Abuse: Ambabusese and
English.
3. All communications to Ambassador Abuse are in Ambabusese, but the
rules
communications
to Ambassador Abuse in Ambabusese
5. Ambabusese is a strange language: If Agora would interpret the
Ambabusese as transferring a number of Yaks, but failing to transfer Yaks
such that both Sgeo and woggle gain at least 1000 Yaks in the week, the
Ambabusese meaning is, translated
A communication to Ambassador Abuse: I change rule 6 to read If rule 5
does not specify the meaning of a communication that is in Ambabusese, then
the meaning of the Ambabusese is equivalent to the English meaning of ROT13
applied to the communication, as long as that does not mean a denial or
The initiator, the lucky one, and all persons unqualified to judge
the associated criminal case are unqualified to judge a recovery
case. Additionally, the lucky one is unqualified to judge the
associated criminal case.
Does this mean that third parties can bar other
To the best of my knowledge, I did not send the above-quoted message and
Sabrina Friedman is not the Horton. The preceding sentence is explicitly
intended as doubt for the purposes of preventing self-ratification.
Pavitra
You sent the message that Sabrina sent on July 12 (iirc, I was
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Here's some temporary tracking info related to Proposals 6877-94.
Rests pre-Rebellion:
14 Tanner L. Swett
1 Wooble
6 Keba
Base voting limits if ehird was not a Rebel (CFJ 2897), thus the
Rebellion failed:
5
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, omd wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Nope. Citizen is not a synonym for registered player. Citizenship is
an entity switch with values
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I initiate Elections for each of the following offices and nominate
the corresponding player for the office.
ATC: G.
Fearmonger: Tiger
Granulator: Tanner L Swett
Pariah: ehird
PSM: Yally
Referee: Sgeo
I suggest
If and only if ehird will not be compensated in Agora for supporting this
appeal in any manner other than props, I support
On Sep 22, 2010 7:23 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On 22 September 2010 20:50, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I intend, with 2 support,
I appear to have accidentally sent to a-d... would the judge still consider
the intended question? Should I resend ttpf?
On Sep 23, 2010 12:01 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Sgeo wrote:
If and only if ehird will not be compensated in Agora for supporting
I want to ear a Farad!
On Sep 2, 2010 4:18 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I submit the following proposal, AI-3, Reward Urgency:
--
Amend the Rule entitled Urgent Proposals by replacing:
The Promotor CAN
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:12 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 17:07 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
=== CFJ 2849 (Interest Index = 0)
The Rule enacted by Proposal 6808 refers to coppro when it
speaks of The Robot.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Aaron Goldfein
aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 19:24, ag...@kebay.org wrote:
Proposal A Perpepuum mobile is possible (AI=2, II=2, distributable via
fee)
{{{
Enact a new Rule with power=2 entitled Perpepuum mobile:
The Perpepuum
Fragment: Filomusks are a currency. Filomusks will become unused
(extinct) in 3008 days
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:59 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
Fragment: Filomusks are a currency. Filomusks will become unused
(extinct) in 3008 days
n.b. if you want to submit a fragment, you'll need to use the Public Forum
Shouldn't yellow ribbons be phased out, given the lamentable
nonexistence of contests?
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 6:37 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 6:04 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
Bribes are fun, but I didn't really want to scam an office I haven't
even been keeping up with the reports of.
As Sgeo just mentioned in ##nomic, I incorrectly awarded
None of the rest of this email should be construed as agreeing to any
agreements, the rest of this email notwithstanding.
I agree to the following contract:
{
This is a public pledge. Only Sgeo and $VICTIM, hereafter referred to
as Victim, can agree to this pledge. Sgeo CAN and MAY
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:20 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
To remove ambiguity, I vote FOR each Agoran Decision for which I have not
cast a vote.
Me too.
What's going on?
it with ais523. As far as I know, e
never acted on it.
I agree to the following public pledge:
{
This is a public pledge called Fair Trade. Only Sgeo and $VICTIM may
agree to this pledge. Upon joining, $VICTIM CAN and SHALL give X units
of currency X to Sgeo. 1 week after this is done, $VICTIM CAN
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
None of the rest of this email should be construed as agreeing to any
agreements, the rest of this email notwithstanding.
I agree to the following
How possibly would it be for even a smallish invasion force to invade?
Are most players still at least reading the emails, despite not
contributing? If not, then a much smaller invasion force is a much
greater threat than usual.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Monday, January 11, 2010, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
How possibly would it be for even a smallish invasion force to invade?
Are most players still at least reading the emails, despite not
contributing
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Schrodinger's Cat
schrodingers.kat...@gmail.com wrote:
I object.
On 12/16/09, Schrodinger's Cat schrodingers.kat...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, without objection, to deregister Schrodinger's Cat.
--
Sent from my mobile device
-- Schrodinger's Cat
--
I intend, without objection, to deregister Sgeo due to inactivity.
I object.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Sgeo wrote:
---
ID: 6545
Title: Because E's Worth It
Author: coppro
AI: 3.0
II: 1
Chamber: Red
Bestow unto Murphy the title of Hero of Agora Nomic
---
ID: 6545
Title: Because E's Worth It
Author: coppro
AI: 3.0
II: 1
Chamber: Red
Bestow unto Murphy the title of Hero of Agora Nomic.
---
You mean
A lot of Agora's ruleset deals with special situations and fringe
cases. Perhaps we would be good to separate the ruleset into two
bodies of law. A supreme constitution including R101, and the basis
of the legislative, judicial, and executive systems, and then all the
details and specifics in
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 6:15 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
It's been pointed out to me that I'm violating the rules by not
reporting on the Distributability of proposals that aren't in the pool
anymore. I resign
[[A player CAN publish a Notice of Violation (with N support,
where N is the number of valid un-Closed Notices of Violation e
previously published during the same week, or by announcement if
N is zero) alleging that a single entity (the Accused) has
broken a Rule.]]
Note
I believe there are at least two people who want my Presto! card. What
are your offers?
The system used by the guild The Goods in A Tale In The Desert is
described in http://wiki.atitd.net/tale3/Guilds/The_Goods/FAQ/The_System
. How would a bank based on such a system work out in Agora?
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
ehird wrote:
2009/8/11 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
When you try to scam an office, you should expect reprisals
Pot, kettle.
What I meant to add (but may have mistakenly left out when I went on to
discuss
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Elliott
Hirdpenguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/8/7 ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk:
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 10:51 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I think the irc logger needs a restart. -G.
Done, thanks for letting me know.
--
ais523
while true; do
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Non-recordkeepors, however, won't.
Actually, it will be a positive pain for recordkeepors (searching multiple
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:08 PM, ais523callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I object to all current intents to create Flag Candidates.
me too.
Does that include the one with the wrench?
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Kenner Gordonkenner...@gmail.com wrote:
Never mind, I had forgotten that I could use a digest. I do not deregister.
--
*** You have died ***
Would you like to RESTART, REPLY to this e-mail, or QUIT?
Hi there, Warrigal II (Warrigal's known for accidentally
Announcing Framework Nomic at
http://groups.google.com/group/framework-nomic . The idea is to be a
nomic that is entirely contract based. As much as possible will be
effectively privatized, including the judicial system.
http://groups.google.com/group/framework-nomic/web/base-draft is my
current
To be honest, I don't find the current position card you hold
appealing. Perhaps we could join a contract where I'd name you as
mentor, then at a later point, I can cause you to give me cards?
I do not agree to the below contract at this time:
{
This is a public contract. Murphy and Sgeo CAN
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:16 PM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:37 PM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
Starting tomorrow I will be unable to send or receive messages for two
weeks. Accordingly, I go on hold. After publishing this week's SLR
I'll resign Rulekeepor; if
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Sgeosgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:16 PM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:37 PM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
Starting tomorrow I will be unable to send or receive messages for two
weeks. Accordingly, I go on hold.
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/group.php?gid=21692852114ref=ts
Might we want to open relations with them?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Murphy ROGCBK MUVIY 11
How much would Murphy be willing to give me in order for me to name em
as my mentor?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Sgeo wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Murphy ROGCBK MUVIY 11
How much would Murphy be willing to give me in order for me to name em
as my mentor?
What
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:02 AM, ais523callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Again, no puzzles this week or last week. Come on, people; now point
output has been reduced, points are more valuable than ever; and when
nobody else is submitting puzzles, the potential rewards for them are
larger
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
I spend E E to give ais523 an E Note.
I spend E E to destroy one of Sgeo's Rests.
Thank you.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Elliott
Hirdpenguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
I transfer a prop from myself to Sgeo because xx.
It was for getting your Three Worlds Collide reference. I wonder how
the above would be notated in Airstrip One.
I have in my email archive issues from the AWJ dated after March 2007,
which is the latest one available from Murphy's site.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
Disclaimer: The text of proposals below may or may not be correct.
I've had to guess what each person submitting a proposal intended to
type into their email client when submitting a message. It's entirely
possible this
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
For each Agoran Decision currently in its voting period, if FOR is a
valid option for that decision, I cast a number of ballots FOR on that
decision equal to my voting limit on that decision.
If you're that lazy, why not just
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:32 PM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Proposal: IADoP CAN and SHALL (AI = 2, II = 1):
I intend, with 3 support, to make the quoted
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Paul VanKoughnett allisp...@gmail.com wrote:
I retract my proposal Very little to no lurk time.
Please respond if you believe you deserve the Patent Title of Not A Lurker.
I'll resubmit when I have a more complete list.
Who has the longest lurk time? I have
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
I've lurked since 2005... kind of. I was interested in Agora in 2005,
but did not participate, nor did I ask to be a watcher. I was
subscribed to a-d, but
As soon as possible after a first-class person joins this contract for
the first time the contestmaster CAN and SHALL create three Cauldrons
and three Vials (each with one random component) in the possession of
that person.
So what happens when the second first-class person joins? I know it's
Selecting a nickname that contains more than 20 characters, or more
than two non-alphanumeric characters is the class 5 crime of Mentally
Assaulting an Officer, unless at the same time as the selection the
player changing nicknames supplies a suitable abbreviation which fits
the required
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
I change my nickname to You May Call Me Big Fucking Edward.
Three Worlds Collide?
With less than 56 invaders in Parrwater, any Senator we elect there
can be impeached by the populace of Parrwater.. assuming that they're
paying attention.
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
With less than 56 invaders in Parrwater, any Senator we elect there
can be impeached by the populace of Parrwater.. assuming that they're
paying attention.
Number of invaders needed to impeach the current Senator of Parrwater:
2
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
With less than 56 invaders in Parrwater, any Senator we elect there
can be impeached by the populace of Parrwater.. assuming that they're
paying attention.
Number
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
With less than 56 invaders in Parrwater, any Senator we elect there
can be impeached by the populace of Parrwater.. assuming that they're
paying attention.
Number
let i = number of invaders needed
let c = number of loyal citizens in the colony
i = ceil(c/5)
Note that this does not take into account attempts at impeaching the
invaders. For that, data on who is active and inactive in the colony
is needed.
Population data from http://www.aeri can
Didn't they say that we were rejected as a micronation because we
claimed no land? Perhaps we could claim land someplace like Metaplace
or Whirled or SL? (SL is costly, but for a small area, I can afford
it)
Let i = number of invaders needed to prevent the Aericans from
impeaching our Senators
Let c = the number of active and aware members of a colony
i = 5c+1
Anyone willing to collect the data on activity and inactivity?
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
Let i = number of invaders needed to prevent the Aericans from
impeaching our Senators
Let c = the number of active and aware members of a colony
i = 5c+1
Anyone willing to collect the data on activity and inactivity
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
Let i = number of invaders needed to prevent the Aericans from
impeaching our Senators
Let c = the number of active and aware members of a colony
i = 5c+1
When c
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
let i = number of invaders needed
let c = number of loyal citizens in the colony
i = ceil(c/5)
Note that this does not take into account attempts at impeaching the
invaders. For that, data on who is active and inactive
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 21:28 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
Making it so that only one new person a day can register might slow
down invasions. Perhaps making it so that only 2 people can register
in any given block of two consecutive days
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
Each of the following CFJs are Interest Index 2:
I CFJ {It is POSSIBLE to enact a power-4 rule reading in part {This rule
Suppose that, for some reason, a Terrible Proposal is on the ballot. A
large invasion force may join, say, a day before the Assessor is due
to asses the proposal, and vote FOR it. Unless 3 Senators are on
constant surveillance for such things, it may be impossible to stop
the proposal being voted
On 5/5/09, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Proposal: Second-class judges
(AI = 2, please)
[Now that second-class registration is restricted, other restrictions
can be loosened up.]
Amend Rule 1868 (Judge Assignment Generally) by removing first-class
from this text:
On 5/5/09, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 11:18 -0600, Sam Benner wrote:
I vote for this proposal.
It hasn't been distributed yet; wait until the Promotor publishes a
distribution of proposals, then you can vote on it. (It's more
convenient voting on a
Making it so that only one new person a day can register might slow
down invasions. Perhaps making it so that only 2 people can register
in any given block of two consecutive days might also help in the case
that two people happen to try to register in one day.
Classification scheme for invasion
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Rodlen rodlenj...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Quazie quazieno...@gmail.com wrote:
i pledge that any future e-mail i send to agora will be signed with
'gwen' to minimize confusion.
-gwen
Seriously, get your own email address. For the
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/5/2 Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com:
Any thoughts on testing any plans? Either for real, by telling /b/
about Agora, or simulation (let several players control 1,000
first-class players, and a way to guard
Any thoughts on making an in-Agora simulation?
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I destroy all of the Ribbons in the possession of Murphy, ais523,
coppro, and comex.
That was unnecessarily vengeful, and (unlike the scam's CotC abuse)
difficult to reverse. I nominate
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
Zing! Vext cwm fly jabs Kurd qoph
Will we all get to learn what the Clues were?
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
comex wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, I just realized that one of the voting-limit 0 methods (which
basically involves the Grand Poobah pulling out a very illegal but very
Any thoughts on testing any plans? Either for real, by telling /b/
about Agora, or simulation (let several players control 1,000
first-class players, and a way to guard against the fallout when the
simulation ends).
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I tried to post a thesis to the public forum recently but it was held
for approval due to being too long. Until it turns up, have a version
sent as a compressed attachment to save on size. I hereby publish the
document
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I retract the previous version of this proposal.
Proposal: Decriminalize restricted actions
(AI = 3, please)
Amend Rule 2125 (Regulation Regulations) by replacing this text:
d) The rules explicitly state that it
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Aaron Goldfein
aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Okay, you're not playing anymore (AI = 2)
Change the text of Rule 2130 (Activity) that reads:
A player who has been continuously Inactive for at least three
months CAN be deregistered by any other
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 13:53 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
Almost certainly Murphy; IIRC, the first time a-b broke was after I
joined, and Murphy's been CotC
WATCHERS (3)
Nickname E-mail address Requested
Dave davidni...@gmail.com 06 Jan 03
Phlogistique noe.rubinst...@gmail.com 16 Sep
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I intend, without member objection, to amend the Werewolves contract
by appending this text:
*) This contract hereby terminates.
Did someone forget to do something? Or is there literally no interest
in Werewolves right
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Q0ZKOiB7VGhpcyBDRkogZXhpc3RzLn0=
What's with the strange character at the end of the subject?
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Q0ZKOiB7VGhpcyBDRkogZXhpc3RzLn0=
What's with the strange character at the end of the subject?
Nevermind.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Wooble wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
I CFJ {Warrigal has, at the time of this message, voted on proposal 6164}.
I FAIL.
That's probably not sufficiently
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
I award 20 points to Murphy as contestmaster of the FRC.
The AAA is no longer a contest. The reading of the rule is a bit
strange here, but I'm going to say
:
Consenting Nominees
Herald: Sgeo, Goethe
What about Yally?
Why would BobTHJ lose eir MwPship? pikhq should have lost it after
ais523+AFO won. BobTHJ then loses MwPship when comex wins. ais523
gains Speakership.
1 - 100 of 322 matches
Mail list logo
