Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Promotor election

2016-10-23 Thread Luis Ressel
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 23:50:33 +0100 ais523 wrote: > On Sat, 2016-10-22 at 12:10 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Other note:  A fair thing to do would be to hold an election.  But  > > election for ADoP is resolved by ADoP - a problem!  We actually  > > used to have

BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Promotor election

2016-10-23 Thread Aris Merchant
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 3:50 PM, ais523 > wrote: > > This kind-of implies it should be the Promotor who resolves an ADoP > election, except that that doesn't really make logical sense. Perhaps > it should

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Promotor election

2016-10-22 Thread ais523
On Sat, 2016-10-22 at 12:10 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Other note:  A fair thing to do would be to hold an election.  But  > election for ADoP is resolved by ADoP - a problem!  We actually  > used to have "separation of powers" for this, something that read: > > "In the case that the election is

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Promotor election

2016-10-22 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Aris Merchant wrote: > On Saturday, October 22, 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > I think we just call it "converging the gamestate" (very much not new to > Alexis.  Here you go. > > Maybe we don't need a new term, but I was talking about

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Promotor election

2016-10-22 Thread Aris Merchant
On Saturday, October 22, 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > I think we just call it "converging the gamestate" (very much not new to > Alexis. Here you go. > Maybe we don't need a new term, but I was talking about the specific case where the person in an office was unclear.