Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2890 assigned to coppro

2010-10-18 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:42 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: I intend to appeal this with two support.  Making a proposal undistributable modifies information for which some player is required to be a recordkeepor, so R2125 forbids me from doing it except as allowed by the rules.

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2890 assigned to coppro

2010-10-18 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:42 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: I intend to appeal this with two support.  Making a proposal undistributable modifies information for which some player is required to be a recordkeepor, so R2125 forbids me from

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2890 assigned to coppro

2010-10-18 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, omd wrote: On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: As forbidden is not defined as directly associated with a particular MMI mode, and (in general English) could be applied to either CAN or SHALL, I'd say context is important.  In

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2890 assigned to coppro

2010-10-18 Thread omd
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: Side note:  When I proposed this, I thought for a while about sneaking an only between CAN and perform for the final draft and hoping no-one noticed it would shut off all other ways of doing things associated with a

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2890 assigned to coppro

2010-10-18 Thread Ed Murphy
omd wrote: On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: === CFJ 2890 (Interest Index = 0) It is generally POSSIBLE for me to make a proposal Undistributable for a fee.