On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 02:41, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Title: Administrative Adjudication v2
> Adoption index: 3.0
AI can be 2.0 now.
This sounds fun. There could be interesting struggles between
officers. E.g. I could imagine the Treasuror and ADoP arguing over who
gets to
On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 18:40 -0800, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> I made several changes, including clarifying that the judiciary has
> judicial review over memoranda. I also decided to go in the direction
> of making memoranda purely interpretative, because I have other plans
> for
On 1/8/2020 8:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
which shall consist in a public document and shall, once issued,
resolve bindingly, by interpretation of law and fact, such matters within
Mulling it over more, what exactly do you mean by "interpreting facts"?
In the current context of the
On 1/8/2020 6:40 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
Each officer has the power to, with notice, issue a memorandum,
Do you think "has the power to" is a reasonable synonym for CAN - it's
kind of an overloaded word that we don't use that way currently (and "CAN"
is simplier than
I made several changes, including clarifying that the judiciary has
judicial review over memoranda. I also decided to go in the direction
of making memoranda purely interpretative, because I have other plans
for gamestate changes that have more safeguards. I've allowed them to
be like CFJs or
5 matches
Mail list logo
