On 26/06/2013 11:29 PM, Chuck Carroll wrote:
I invoke judgement on the following statement: The assignment of Walker as
Judge for the statement The selection of a Judge for this statement is a
move whose legality cannot be determined with finality is a move whose
legality cannot be determined
It'll be interesting if Michael rules that this statement is FALSE, on the
ground that the selection of a Judge for the earlier statement (and by
extension, his own selection as Judge) can be shown to be illegal.
On 27 June 2013 21:11, Fool fool1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26/06/2013 11:29 PM,
I the matter of the CFJ of Chuck's that I have been assigned to judge, I return
a verdict of FALSE.
Obviously, this agrees with Charles Walker’s recent judgement, but I also think
he slightly misinterpreted the relevant rule, while simultaneously making
perfectly reasonable decisions about our
3 matches
Mail list logo
