A communication to Ambassador Abuse: I change rule 5 to read 'Ambabusese is
a strange language: If Agora would interpret the Ambabusese as transferring
or awarding a number of Yaks, but failing to transfer or award Yaks such
that both Sgeo and woggle gain at least 3000 Yaks in the week, the
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Sgeo wrote:
A communication to Ambassador Abuse: I change rule 5 to read 'Ambabusese is a
strange language: If Agora would
interpret the Ambabusese as transferring or awarding a number of Yaks, but
failing to transfer or award Yaks such
that both Sgeo and woggle gain
wait now i am confused is agora xx its own nomic as is ambassador abuse or
are they subdivisions of that thing we know as agora
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Sgeo wrote:
A communication to Ambassador Abuse: I change rule 5 to
Agora XX was its own nomic that ran on the Agora discussion list
for the past couple weeks. It's over now.
Ambassador abuse is (in theory) also its own nomic, which was
created for the purpose of trying to scam something in Agora.
-G.
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Max Schutz wrote:
wait now i am
sounds kinda bizzarre
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Agora XX was its own nomic that ran on the Agora discussion list
for the past couple weeks. It's over now.
Ambassador abuse is (in theory) also its own nomic, which was
created for the
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
3. All communications to Ambassador Abuse are in Ambabusese, but the rules
themselves are in English,
Now that I have a keyboard, I'll note that this is something like
ISIDTID - just because Ambassador Abuse deems certain messages
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 23:32 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
1. This is the ruleset of a nomic called Ambassador Abuse
2. There are two languages used by Ambassador Abuse: Ambabusese and English.
3. All communications to Ambassador Abuse are in Ambabusese, but the rules
themselves are in English,
4. All
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 23:32 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
1. This is the ruleset of a nomic called Ambassador Abuse
2. There are two languages used by Ambassador Abuse: Ambabusese and English.
3. All communications to Ambassador Abuse are in Ambabusese, but the rules
themselves are in English,
4. All
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:45 AM, woggle woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/28/13 6:19 , Alex Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 23:32 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
1. This is the ruleset of a nomic called Ambassador Abuse
2. There are two languages used by Ambassador Abuse: Ambabusese and
English.
3.
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to flip Ambassador Abuse's recognition
to Hostile. I also warn Ambassador Abuse that while impostors may
claim that they are the Ambassador of Agora, I am the one holding that
office at the moment.
Now don't break the game while I'm out camping. =P
~ Roujo
On Fri,
I support.
On Jun 28, 2013 12:37 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Jonathan Rouillard
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to flip Ambassador Abuse's recognition
to Hostile. I also warn Ambassador Abuse that
On 28/06/2013 10:55 AM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
Gratuitous argument: A-D is Not A Public Forum, and is not subject to
the strictness of a PF. As long as someone makes it clear *each time*
that their potentially confusing nickname is not going to confuse Agora
play, it's okay.
(cough cough)
I just noticed a contradiction in Ambassador Abuse's original rules,
between 3 and 7. Ambassador Abuse does not, and never has had, a CfJ
mechanism. So, if Ambassador Abuse's contradiction affects Agora's
gamestate, which it almost certainly does, what happens?
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:19 AM,
On 28/06/2013 8:40 PM, Sgeo wrote:
I just noticed a contradiction in Ambassador Abuse's original rules,
between 3 and 7.
(Rule 7 is more specific, supercedes.)
Ambassador Abuse does not, and never has had, a CfJ mechanism.
Players of AA must resolve their differences by consensus.
So, if
On Jun 28, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to flip Ambassador Abuse's recognition
to Hostile.
I support, because declaring other nomics hostile is fun and we haven't done
that yet as far as I remember.
—Bànluǒ Dēngshān Zhě
1. This is the ruleset of a nomic called Ambassador Abuse
2. There are two languages used by Ambassador Abuse: Ambabusese and English.
3. All communications to Ambassador Abuse are in Ambabusese, but the rules
themselves are in English,
4. All communications on Agora's public fora are considered
A communication to Ambassador Abuse: I change rule 6 to read If rule 5
does not specify the meaning of a communication that is in Ambabusese, then
the meaning of the Ambabusese is equivalent to the English meaning of ROT13
applied to the communication, as long as that does not mean a denial or
17 matches
Mail list logo
