>"The Treasuror CAN cause Agora to pay any player or contract by
announcement if doing so is specified by a rule."
Doing so is specified by the same rule where that text exist. So the
Treasuror could cause Agora to pay any player shinies whenever he wants. Or
at least, that's how I'm understanding
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 7, 2017, at 1:50 AM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>
> Affixed is a new draft. Notable changes include the addition of
> section 1.4 with some tweaks to existing rules, adding sustenance
> (read monthly fees), a few p
On Sep 6, 2017, at 7:58 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>
>>> Repeal rule 2457 ("Lockout").
>>
>> This isn't technically tied to Organizations, but I agree with
>> repealing it anyway just because it's likely to become a dead-end
>> mechanic with
Affixed is a new draft. Notable changes include the addition of
section 1.4 with some tweaks to existing rules, adding sustenance
(read monthly fees), a few power tweaks, and several additions to the
protected actions list. Also included are numerous requested fixes and
typo corrections. I think I
Ah, OK. I look forwards to when you do, then.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:21 AM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm trying not to do the 7 versions thing this time. I haven't added
> ais523's upkeep fee thing yet, as it's more complicated than most of
> these correction
I'm trying not to do the 7 versions thing this time. I haven't added
ais523's upkeep fee thing yet, as it's more complicated than most of
these corrections, and I don't want to publish a new draft until I do.
-Aris
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I see a lot of "done's" and
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> I read this last night, slept on it, skimmed it again, and read the replies.
> Here’s my initial thoughts, thin as they are - I had more, but Gaelan and
> ais523 have already covered most of my inquiries.
>
> On Sep 4, 2017, at 11:10 PM, Ari
I see a lot of "done's" and "fixed" but I don't see a "latest version"
part. Please post it to check it out. (I do a lot/want to do a lot of
Agency stuff lol. It's my favorite mechanic, and if you make it even
better, then, I'd be super grateful)
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:08 AM, Aris Merchant <
tho
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Lines beginning with hashmarks ("#") and comments in square brackets ("[]")
> have no effect on the behavior of this proposal. They are not part of any
> rules
> created or amended herein, and may be considered for all game purposes to
> have
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> Lines beginning with hashmarks ("#") and comments in square brackets ("[]")
>> have no effect on the behavior of this proposal. They are not part of any
>> rules
>> created or amended herein, and may be considered for all game purposes to
>>
Aw, I won't be able to keep / recreate 蘭亭社 under the new proposal. I'll
have to rethink how to test the things that should go with it should this
pass.
I would like to propose adding making CFJs as protected. I think the reason
thereof should be evident if one were party to a theoretical contract
I read this last night, slept on it, skimmed it again, and read the replies.
Here’s my initial thoughts, thin as they are - I had more, but Gaelan and
ais523 have already covered most of my inquiries.
On Sep 4, 2017, at 11:10 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> My proposal has three parts. Part 1 clea
> Lines beginning with hashmarks ("#") and comments in square brackets ("[]")
> have no effect on the behavior of this proposal. They are not part of any
> rules
> created or amended herein, and may be considered for all game purposes to
> have been removed before its resolution.
<3
> [Note that
On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 23:10 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> A few design principles:
>
> 1. Contracts should be easy to use. The primary cause for the failure
> of organizations was their complexity. You had to come up with a name.
> You had to deal with member's budgets. You had to specify whether
I'm going to preface this by saying that my contracts proposal is kind
of long. It may take a few days for everyone to read through it and
stuff. It's long for several reasons. For one thing, it repeals about
as many rules as it creates. As I suggested, this is a consolidation
of the existing Agenc
15 matches
Mail list logo
