I am going to propose something like this (but this is only a Protosal!)
If anyone intents to vote against such a Proposal because e does not
like a certain part of it, please let me know. This proposal could be
split, if needed.
Proposal A Perpepuum mobile is possible (AI=2, II=2,
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote:
I am going to propose something like this (but this is only a Protosal!)
If anyone intents to vote against such a Proposal because e does not
like a certain part of it, please let me know. This proposal could be
split, if needed.
I
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Keba wrote:
The Perpepuum mobile (PM) is a person and active player.
Has an actual fix for The Robot scam been proposed yet? If so
I like this, if not... -G.
Perpepuum isn't a word, to my knowledge; perhaps you're after the
phrase perpetual motion machine. Labour means job or physical
task, so Lab Worker might work better there.
—Tanner L. Swett
Warrigal wrote:
Perpepuum isn't a word, to my knowledge; perhaps you're after the
phrase perpetual motion machine. Labour means job or physical
task, so Lab Worker might work better there.
—Tanner L. Swett
Perpepuum mobile is Latin for perpetual mobile machine and should be ok
as a name and
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 25, 2010, at 9:03 PM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote:
Perpepuum mobile is Latin for perpetual mobile machine
Perpetuum actually, though I like Lab Labour
Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Keba wrote:
The Perpepuum mobile (PM) is a person and active player.
Has an actual fix for The Robot scam been proposed yet? If so
I like this, if not... -G.
Well, it's not clear whether the scam has worked, but there should be a
fix for
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend to vote against any proposal that includes an act-on-behalf
mechanism of any kind.
Oh, why? Just because of bad experiences of the past?
--
Keba
com...@gmail.com wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 25, 2010, at 9:03 PM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote:
Perpepuum mobile is Latin for perpetual mobile machine
Perpetuum actually, though I like Lab Labour
Oh, you're right. Well, you should never look up a word and use it often
with a
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Keba wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Keba wrote:
The Perpepuum mobile (PM) is a person and active player.
Has an actual fix for The Robot scam been proposed yet? If so
I like this, if not... -G.
Well, it's not clear whether the
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, com...@gmail.com wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 25, 2010, at 9:03 PM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote:
Perpepuum mobile is Latin for perpetual mobile machine
Perpetuum actually, though I like Lab Labour
You mean Lab Laboor
--- On Tue, 24/8/10, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I'm reminded of (Peekee?) submitting a Protoposal (instead of
Proto-Proposal) and Kelly saying something like whatever the
hell that is; presumably should be handled by the Protomotor.
That's actually not a bad idea for an office.
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Ed Murphy wrote:
G. wrote:
The physicist is an office and should be held by the PM. Its weekly
report contains how often and by whom the PM has been powered, who is the
Energy Spender and a list of all bot-PM actions of the previous seven days.
If the PM
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Aaron Goldfein
aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 19:24, ag...@kebay.org wrote:
Proposal A Perpepuum mobile is possible (AI=2, II=2, distributable via
fee)
{{{
Enact a new Rule with power=2 entitled Perpepuum mobile:
The Perpepuum
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:53:40 -0400, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
CoE: You also do not have enough ergs to do this.
Enough ergs to discuss something?
Well, it was labelled distributable via fee.
... and the
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:11:32 -0700 (PDT), Kerim Aydin
ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
This violates R101(vii). The only way I can think to get around it (it
has
come up before for other non-natural players) is to re-define R101 so
that
rights apply to natural persons only. This is probably a
Oh my god, the mail looks terrible, I'm sorry. Switched to an email
client, should be better in the future ;)
--
Keba
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, ag...@kebay.org wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:11:32 -0700 (PDT), Kerim Aydin
ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
This violates R101(vii). The only way I can think to get around it (it
has
come up before for other non-natural players) is to re-define R101 so
that
rights
On 08/23/2010 05:21 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, ag...@kebay.org wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:11:32 -0700 (PDT), Kerim Aydin
ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
This violates R101(vii). The only way I can think to get around it (it
has
come up before for other non-natural
Keba wrote:
Is this similar to the AFO? I have not read the proposal/rule of that
player, because I did not want to get inspirated by it, I want to create
something different.
The AFO was a contract-based legal person that any member of the
contract could control at any time by announcement.
G. wrote:
The physicist is an office and should be held by the PM. Its weekly
report contains how often and by whom the PM has been powered, who is the
Energy Spender and a list of all bot-PM actions of the previous seven days.
If the PM holds this office, no real person would be
Keba wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:53:40 -0400, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
CoE: You also do not have enough ergs to do this.
Enough ergs to discuss something?
Well, it was labelled distributable via fee.
Proposal A Perpepuum mobile is possible (AI=2, II=2, distributable via
fee)
{{{
Enact a new Rule with power=2 entitled Perpepuum mobile:
The Perpepuum mobile (PM) is a person and active player. The PM cannot
be deregistered or become inactive, rules to the contrary notwithstanding.
23 matches
Mail list logo
