On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 05:36, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
wrote:
> * 4 points for each switch defined by the rule and tracked by the office
You might want to say "type of switch" to make it clear this doesn't
count each instance. Maybe it would be better just to say "X points if
the rule
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 10:35, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 1/13/20 5:58 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I agree that it would be good to have some way of giving officers extra
> > votes on relevant proposals - this was also
On 1/13/20 5:58 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> I agree that it would be good to have some way of giving officers extra
> votes on relevant proposals - this was also the goal of Trigon's
> "Interesting Chambers" proto - but I'm not sure that this system is
> workable in
Gaelan wrote:
> I create the following proposal: {
> Title: Bureaucratic Power
> AI: 2
> Author: Gaelan
>
> Create a power-2 rule titled “Bureaucrats” with the following text: {
> Each rule is said to have an “affinity” for each office, an integer equal to
> the sum of any points awarded by the
I create the following proposal: {
Title: Bureaucratic Power
AI: 2
Author: Gaelan
Create a power-2 rule titled “Bureaucrats” with the following text: {
Each rule is said to have an “affinity” for each office, an integer equal to
the sum of any points awarded by the following clauses:
* 1 point
5 matches
Mail list logo
