Ed Murphy wrote:
BobTHJ wrote:
A Property Owning Entity (hereafter POE) is a type of entity. POEs may
Why not just Owner?
The word owner is used to refer to the one who owns some piece of
Property. A POE dose not necessarily own anything, e just has the
capacity to do so. I suggest Magnate in
Thanks for your comments! I have incorporated them into the final draft.
BobTHJ
On 5/15/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
a Property is ever not owned by a POE, it ceases to exist.
You probably don't want Properties popping out of existence like that.
Especially if the
I am soliciting comments on the following proto-proposal:
Currency
AI: 1
Create a new rule titled Property with Power 1 and the text:
{
A Property Owning Entity (hereafter POE) is a type of entity. POEs may own
other entities called Properties. All Properties must be owned by a POE. If
a
Roger Hicks wrote:
a Property is ever not owned by a POE, it ceases to exist.
You probably don't want Properties popping out of existence like that.
Especially if the rules say that they exist. Consider having a default
POE (the Treasury) which picks up all unowned Property.
BobTHJ wrote:
A Property Owning Entity (hereafter POE) is a type of entity. POEs may
Why not just Owner?
Because I wanted a clear definition of who/what can and can not own
property.
BobTHJ
On 5/15/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BobTHJ wrote:
A Property Owning Entity (hereafter POE) is a type of entity. POEs may
Why not just Owner?
6 matches
Mail list logo
