Yally wrote:
Supreme cases are a subclass of appeal cases.
The specific word subclass potentially runs afoul of exactly one
in Rule 991.
How about expanding the panel size to five?
An appeal concerning any assignment of judgement in a non-appeal case
within the past two weeks CAN be
This case would create a new level of appeals, The Supreme Court,
which consists of some entitled members and otherwise consists of
members that the CotC subjectively determines to be the most suited
for the case. I THINK the below proposal should properly inherit
appeals issues from appeal cases
If a judgement-on-appeal really needs overturning that badly, a new
identical CFJ can be called.
c. wrote:
Clerk is a judicial case switch, tracked by the Clerk of the
Courts, with values 'CotC' (default) and 'Justiciar'.
This would require the CotC to keep a permanent list of cases
accepted by the Justiciar (not that that's a big deal, though,
compare the Assessor's report
Proto: The Supreme Court (AI=2)
[Cases can be appealed to the Supreme Court, a fixed (elected) set of
three justices. Appeal can be made by announcement but court doesn't
have to accept the appeal. If they do, they need to address the issue
in detail. Compared to normal appeals, the court has
5 matches
Mail list logo
