Pavitra wrote:
> On Saturday 20 September 2008 08:05:42 pm comex wrote:
>> To my mind, this is an example of 'amendment by stealth' of the
>> kind discussed in CFJ 858. I think it conflicts with the Rules the
>> meanings of whose terms it tries to change.
>
> H. CotC Murphy, would it be possible
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Michael Norrish wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
>>> Perhaps it's here?
>>> http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2003-January/000457.html
>>
>> That's the one! Looks like it just made it in to the present-day a
Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
On Saturday 20 September 2008 08:54:26 pm Kerim Aydin wrote:
http://www.nomic.net/~nomicwiki/index.php/AgoraTheses doesn't
list any thesis of yours. Where can it be found?
Hrm, I don't know. It was about three computers ago on my end,
On Sunday 21 September 2008 12:53:38 pm Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Now looking back, I think the committee never got around to
> actually awarding (or denying for that matter) the degree (that was
> when degree- awarding mechanisms were pretty cumbersome). -Goethe.
Perhaps you should resubmit?
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
> On Saturday 20 September 2008 08:54:26 pm Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> http://www.nomic.net/~nomicwiki/index.php/AgoraTheses doesn't
>>> list any thesis of yours. Where can it be found?
>>
>> Hrm, I don't know. It was about three computers ago on my end, the
>>
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Make rules ordinal by category. Rules in different categories are
> incomparable precedence-wise. Additionally, rules cannot reference
> terms, concepts, or entities defined in other categories without an
> explicit "impo
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proto-proto: Make power ordinal rather than cardinal, and organize the
> ruleset by power. Occasionally we would have rules like "rules below
> this one can be changed with AI >= 2". Early (powerful) rules would
> include "def
On Saturday 20 September 2008 09:35:06 pm ihope wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Ben Caplan wrote:
> > Proto-proto: Make power ordinal rather than cardinal, and
> > organize the ruleset by power. Occasionally we would have rules
> > like "rules below this one can be changed with AI >= 2".
On Saturday 20 September 2008 08:05:42 pm comex wrote:
> Really, the Agoran power system is completely broken. Any
> high-power Rule that uses a term defined in a low-power Rule is
> potentially a conduit for a "power escalation" by a scamster, and
> often is.
On Thursday 09 January 2003 05:49:54
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proto-proto: Make power ordinal rather than cardinal, and organize the
> ruleset by power. Occasionally we would have rules like "rules below
> this one can be changed with AI >= 2". Early (powerful) rules would
> include "def
On Saturday 20 September 2008 08:54:26 pm Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > http://www.nomic.net/~nomicwiki/index.php/AgoraTheses doesn't
> > list any thesis of yours. Where can it be found?
>
> Hrm, I don't know. It was about three computers ago on my end, the
> only other place it ended up was on the mail
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
> On Saturday 20 September 2008 08:51:14 pm Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> making that broader adjustment was, for some reasons I don't quite
>> recall, the subject of some interesting discussion which never came
>> around to an agreed-upon fix.
>>
>> -Goethe.
>
> Pro
On Saturday 20 September 2008 08:51:14 pm Kerim Aydin wrote:
> making that broader adjustment was, for some reasons I don't quite
> recall, the subject of some interesting discussion which never came
> around to an agreed-upon fix.
>
> -Goethe.
Proto-proto: Make power ordinal rather than cardinal,
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008, comex wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nice example, since the creation of the fountain was due to such a scam.
>> It's called a "ladder scam". This was the subject of my thesis, and I
>> believe Andre's as well. IIRC I thin
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
> On Saturday 20 September 2008 08:19:44 pm Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Nice example, since the creation of the fountain was due to such a
>> scam. It's called a "ladder scam". This was the subject of my
>> thesis, and I believe Andre's as well. IIRC I think I re
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice example, since the creation of the fountain was due to such a scam.
> It's called a "ladder scam". This was the subject of my thesis, and I
> believe Andre's as well. IIRC I think I recommended at the time
> a tweak t
On Saturday 20 September 2008 08:19:44 pm Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Nice example, since the creation of the fountain was due to such a
> scam. It's called a "ladder scam". This was the subject of my
> thesis, and I believe Andre's as well. IIRC I think I recommended
> at the time a tweak to R754 but I
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008, comex wrote:
> Really, the Agoran power system is completely broken. Any high-power
> Rule that uses a term defined in a low-power Rule is potentially a
> conduit for a "power escalation" by a scamster, and often is. Not
> only do high-power Rules do often use such definitio
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 6:04 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any player can make arbitrary changes to the rules with 12 Support.
Not much of an escape clause when it depends on a Power=1 rule to
define "player". Swap "player" for "person" and you're still
depending on multiple Power=2 rul
19 matches
Mail list logo
