On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 2:32 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Can someone point me to the CFJ that says "authorized to" conditions are
> triggered by a CAN, but not a SHALL? (specifically that look at the term
> "authorize", I'm just curious how much that highly-used but undefined in
On 6/26/2020 8:59 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
wrote:
>
> G., you will need to initiate the decisions, but you can't yet, so hold
> on until the Fixes pass.
>
Can someone point me to the CFJ that says "authorized to" conditions are
triggered by a CAN, but not a SHALL?
On 6/26/20 12:37 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/26/20 11:10 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> I plead guilty, but I really do think that 4 blots is too high a penalty
>> for what I did. I wrote a patch for a bug that was possibly exploitable
>> in the future, but I certified i
On 6/26/2020 8:59 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> G., you will need to initiate the decisions, but you can't yet, so hold
> on until the Fixes pass.
>
Yah knowing this was coming up is one reason I grabbed the green ribbon
when I did :)
On 6/26/20 11:10 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I plead guilty, but I really do think that 4 blots is too high a penalty
> for what I did. I wrote a patch for a bug that was possibly exploitable
> in the future, but I certified it under what I think was a plausible
> reading of the rule
5 matches
Mail list logo
