G. wrote:
If I have to join Airstrip One to have and transfer props, I do so.
You don't, so you don't.
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
4 c.
wow.
--
-c.
comex wrote:
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
4 c.
wow.
You were down to 2 for a while.
Proto: At the beginning of each month, any player with 9 props
gains one and any player with 19 props loses one (reflecting the
memories of old glory/shame
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
comex wrote:
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
4 c.
wow.
You were down to 2 for a while.
Proto: At the beginning of each month, any player with 9 props
gains one and any
Ed Murphy wrote:
comex wrote:
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
4 c.
wow.
You were down to 2 for a while.
Proto: At the beginning of each month, any player with 9 props
gains one and any player with 19 props loses one (reflecting the
memories of
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 00:32 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Yally wrote:
CoE: Billy Pilgrim and root are not players.
Admitted, they lost their props upon deregistration.
I intend, without objection, to destroy all props owned by the
Lost and Found Department.
I object. Transferring them to
ais523 wrote:
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 00:32 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Yally wrote:
CoE: Billy Pilgrim and root are not players.
Admitted, they lost their props upon deregistration.
I intend, without objection, to destroy all props owned by the
Lost and Found Department.
I object.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I object. Transferring them to players without objection would be a lot
more interesting; a sort of way to collectively and harmlessly award
players for good work, rather than have to transfer props from oneself.
NttPF.
Rodlen wrote:
Tue 9 Jun 05:22:38 Pavitra : PavitraRolden (spelling)
I'm sorry, but I just have to do this:
I CFJ on the following statement: Rodlen and Rolden are different players.
Gratuitous arguments: see CFJs 2575-6.
c-walker wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com
mailto:emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Flight Schedule
If I haven't already, I join this contract.
It lets you, but you don't need to; props are available to all
first-class players, amendment is
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
c-walker wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com
mailto:emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Flight Schedule
If I haven't already, I join this contract.
It lets you, but you
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Flight Schedule
If I haven't already, I join this contract.
--
C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
You
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.comwrote:
If I haven't already, I join this contract.
You can't join this contract.
R2198:
If a contract does not purport to regulate becoming a party to it, then any
person CAN become a party to it by announcement.
--
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Prop holdings
-
25 ais523
15 allispaul
13 Billy Pilgrim
7 comex
13 coppro
13 ehird
13 G.
17 Murphy
13 OscarMeyr
10 Pavitra
13 Quazie
17 root
12 Sgeo
17 Tiger
13 Tom
17 Wooble
17
Taral wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Prop holdings
-
25 ais523
15 allispaul
13 Billy Pilgrim
7 comex
13 coppro
13 ehird
13 G.
17 Murphy
13 OscarMeyr
10 Pavitra
13 Quazie
17 root
12 Sgeo
17 Tiger
13 Tom
17
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 05:07 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
BOTH nicks?
On 2009-05-20, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
13 Arnold Bros (est. 1905)
15 ehird
Obviously people like your old nick more than your new one...
--
ais523
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
2009/5/20 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 05:07 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
BOTH nicks?
On 2009-05-20, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
13 Arnold Bros (est. 1905)
15 ehird
Obviously people like your old nick more than
BOTH nicks?
On 2009-05-20, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Flight Schedule
Date of this report: Wed 20 May 09
Date of last report: Tue 28 Apr 09
(All times are UTC)
Recent events
-
Tue 7 Apr 21:26:24 Murphy: Murphy ehird (false recusals)
Mon 13 Apr
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 8:43 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
23 ais523
23+ = Pilot (highest = Captain)
Nice.
It'd be even nicer if props were at all useful anymore.
Wooble wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 8:43 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
23 ais523
23+ = Pilot (highest = Captain)
Nice.
It'd be even nicer if props were at all useful anymore.
The original intent of props was
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
The original intent of props was similar to that of Patent Titles,
i.e. useless beyond bragging rights. That said, with the RBoA gone,
you could try amending the PBA to offer Pilots a similar advantage.
The PBA is
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
The original intent of props was similar to that of Patent Titles,
i.e. useless beyond bragging rights. That said, with the RBoA gone,
you could try amending the PBA to offer Pilots a similar
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
23 ais523
23+ = Pilot (highest = Captain)
Nice.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Flight Schedule
Date of this report: Tue 7 Apr 09
Date of last report: Mon 23 Feb 09
(All times are UTC)
Recent events
-
Tue 3 Feb 21:24:41 Murphy: Wooble comex (OVER 9000)
Thu 5 Feb
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Umm, would someone mind explaining what exactly this is?
http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/airstrip-one
-root
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Umm, would someone mind explaining what exactly this is?
The report on props, as defined by Airstrip One.
On 22 Jan 2009, at 01:17, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
I transfer a prop from ehird to Murphy, to restore Murphy to Pilot
status.
Completely Missing the Point of Props 2: Electric Boogaloo
27 matches
Mail list logo
