On 6/11/20 9:55 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: > [Jason pointed out a while ago, that you could argue that when a judgement > option ceased to be defined (like UNDETERMINED has), it ceased to be a > judgement, so the case reverted to open. Not sure if that's true, but > this makes sure the "validity when assigned" is what matters].
Oh, I just started drafting a CFJ to ask whether this was the case (which is made me remember reading about the Pineapple Partnership being a judge...); I guess that's moot now. But don't worry, I've still got a few other ways to harass you :). -- Jason Cobb
