On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 19:56 -0400, comex wrote:
I join Nomic Wars I.
I add the following section to Nomic Wars I:
{
Sections with lower Ratings take precedence over sections with higher
Ratings; Sections of this contract whose Rating is a positive integer
are void and do not apply.
}
This
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Charles Reiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 17:08, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 17:56, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I join Nomic Wars I.
I
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:48 AM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even without that, the arguments against things spontaneously coming
into power like that are unbreakably strong.
How strong? Presently there are two self-consistent interpretations
of the Nomic Wars contract-- the original
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, comex wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:48 AM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even without that, the arguments against things spontaneously coming
into power like that are unbreakably strong.
How strong? Presently there are two self-consistent interpretations
of the
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:01 AM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:48 AM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even without that, the arguments against things spontaneously coming
into power like that are unbreakably strong.
How strong? Presently there are two
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 17:56, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I join Nomic Wars I.
I add the following section to Nomic Wars I:
{
Sections with lower Ratings take precedence over sections with higher
Ratings; Sections of this contract whose Rating is a positive integer
are void and do not
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 17:56, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I join Nomic Wars I.
I add the following section to Nomic Wars I:
{
Sections with lower Ratings take precedence over sections with higher
Ratings; Sections of this contract whose Rating is a positive integer
are void and do not
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 17:56, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I join Nomic Wars I.
I add the following section to Nomic Wars I:
{
Sections with lower Ratings take precedence over sections with higher
Ratings; Sections of
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:09 PM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want to, say I can do anything by announcement; this sentence
takes precedence over the laws of physics. and see what happens.
Hmm.
When we agree to the rules of a nomic, what are we really agreeing
to-- what thing defines
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 13:31, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a set of things called Rules, but they could be renamed to
Regulations without ceasing to be in effect; yet if I make a set of
things known to
Agora as Regulations, through a contract, they cannot govern the
gamestate. So
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would anyone take it seriously if the US Congress passed a law stating
that their legislation took precedence over the US Constitution, which
was now void?
Possibly these people:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correction: the rules allow you to create a new VOIDED section.
Nomic Wars does not say that I can create a new Voided Section by
announcement, which might become a Section. Rather, it says that I
can create a Section, and
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 17:08, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 17:56, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I join Nomic Wars I.
I add the following section to Nomic Wars I:
{
Sections with lower Ratings take precedence over sections with higher
Ratings; Sections of
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Charles Reiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 17:08, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 17:56, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I join Nomic Wars I.
I add the following section to Nomic Wars I:
{
Sections with lower
14 matches
Mail list logo
