On Sat, 5 Apr 2014, khoyobeg...@gmail.com wrote:
> I set myself as inactive
Aside: Is there a reason to keep Activity at all with the
current quorum and judgement rules?
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:40 AM, omd wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to make Wooble inactive.
Good luck with that.
--
Wooble
I object to being excluded!
--aperfectring
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Jonathan Rouillard <
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I am inactive, I object to any pending intention to make me inactive.
>
> ~ Roujo
>
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Schrodinger's Cat
wrote:
> I think you forgot to reactivate yourself first.
Pretty sure I'm active.
On 10/11/2013 01:10 AM, omd wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Schrodinger's Cat
wrote:
I object to all of the above attempts to make people inactive.
I re-intend them. It would be difficult to meet quorum with such a
large number of idle active players.
I think you forgot to reactivat
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> I act.
FYI, as Registrar, I am not treating this as making you active.
c-walker wrote:
> Can someone tell me how the Absolv-o-matic thing ended? Do I still have a
> rest?
Recently fixed by Proposal 6409. Yes, I think so.
C-walker wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> C-walker wrote:
>>> I become active.
>>>
>>> It looks like I missed an interesting week!
>>>
>>> Can someone tell me how the Absolv-o-matic thing ended? Do I still have a
>>> rest?
>> I believe so, but you still have a card.
>
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> C-walker wrote:
>> I become active.
>>
>> It looks like I missed an interesting week!
>>
>> Can someone tell me how the Absolv-o-matic thing ended? Do I still have a
>> rest?
>
> I believe so, but you still have a card.
Ok, thanks for clearing t
C-walker wrote:
> I become active.
>
> It looks like I missed an interesting week!
>
> Can someone tell me how the Absolv-o-matic thing ended? Do I still have a
> rest?
I believe so, but you still have a card.
> H. IADoP, are there any nomination periods in progress?
Yes, for the office of Ta
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:18, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to make each of the following players inactive:
>
> allispaul
Isn't allispaul already inactive?
BobTHJ
Can you blame me? You've been inflating quorum for no purpose for months.
On 2009-06-16, Christian Julius wrote:
> Temper...
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Elliott Hird <
> penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Jesus F'in Christ. You'd better.
>>
>> On 2009-06-16, Christian Julius
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 07:44, Elliott
Hird wrote:
> Jesus F'in Christ. You'd better.
>
I transfer a P*** from E to for the use of l**
BobTHJ
Temper...
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Elliott Hird <
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Jesus F'in Christ. You'd better.
>
> On 2009-06-16, Christian Julius wrote:
> > I object.
> > Planning to vote this time
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Aaron Goldfein
> > wrote:
> >
> >
Jesus F'in Christ. You'd better.
On 2009-06-16, Christian Julius wrote:
> I object.
> Planning to vote this time
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>
>> I intend, without objection, to make Siege inactive.
>>
>> I pledge that if Siege objects to the above intent, I will
2009/6/15 Aaron Goldfein :
> I intend, without objection, to make Siege inactive.
>
> I pledge that if Siege objects to the above intent, I will submit a
> proposals that has the effect of making Siege inactive.
>
I support.
--
-Tiger
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Charles Reiss wrote:
> I become active.
>
> I mill
>9 + 1 = X
>8 - 9 = X
>8 - 9 = X
>3 * 7 = X
>3 * 7 = X
>4 * 8 = X
>3 / 8 = X
>3 / 8 = X
>6 / 3 = 2
>6 / 3 = 2
>
> I harvest 2530, 2531 (recent CFJ numbers) for 4 WRV.
>
> -w
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> HP2 joins the AAA.
Welcome!
> HP2 requests subsidization.
Fails; only first-class farmers are eligible for subsidization.
OscarMeyr wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Geoffrey Spear
>> wrote:
>>> I intend, without objection, to deregister the following players for
>>> inactivity: arkestra, cdm014, Quazie.
>> Having received no objections, I deregiste
On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 14:12 -0500, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Geoffrey Spear
> > wrote:
> >> I intend, without objection, to deregister the following players for
> >> inactivity: arkestra, cdm014, Quazie.
On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 11:16 -0500, comex wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Siege wrote:
> > I object to my own deactivation (Siege). I'm here, just biding my time.
>
> NttPF
I won't resolve that particular intent after such a good-faith (if
slightly scary) attempt to object to it.
--
ai
Sorry about that, got it sent to the right one eventually...
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 3:16 AM, comex wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Siege wrote:
> > I object to my own deactivation (Siege). I'm here, just biding my time.
>
> NttPF
>
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Siege wrote:
> I object to my own deactivation (Siege). I'm here, just biding my time.
NttPF
Siege wrote:
> I object to my own deactivation (Siege). I'm here, just biding my time.
Ominous!
I object to my own deactivation (Siege). I'm here, just biding my time.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 23:08 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > I cause the AFO to publish this.
> >
> > Registrar's Census
> I'm going a bit further with deactivation than normal
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:21 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I object to the inactivation of OscarMeyr and Pavitra, each of whom is
> clearly active, to save them the trouble.
Ugh, sorry. I skimmed through the messages far too quickly...
--
ais523
26 matches
Mail list logo
