(I argue that although this conditional appears to rest on a future CFJ's
interpretation, making it inextricable, there is objectively only one "law"
which judges in the Agoran system merely discover, so this conditional
should work)
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 7:31 AM Rebecca wrote:
> If I am requi
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
Amend the last paragraph of rule 2551 'Auction End' by removing the
final sentence.
This also removes a clarifying part about Agora and the relevant CAN,
which may not be obvious otherwise, since Agora is AFAICT not commonly
presented as an agent in
I mean, all someone has to do to run an unofficial auction is say that
they'll give a number of assets to someone who gives them the most of some
currency and then maybe back it by a pledge.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018, 16:28 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> > Create
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> Create a new power-1 rule entitled 'Free Auctions' with the text:
>
> A player who is not the auctioneer of an existing Auction
> specified by this rule CAN, by announcement, initiate an auction
> with emself as the auctioneer The lo
Any rule messiness regarding auctions is to be blamed on me. :)
On 10/18/2018 5:06 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
I submit the following two proposals:
-
title: Auction cleanup
ai: 1
author: Trigon
coauthors:
[ Comment: I noticed that there are an entire eight rules defining
auctions and I th
All of these are valid except the last. If a player is the auctioneer, e
becomes the announcer as well.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018, 16:00 Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> Good idea! Minor comments on the second one:
>
> > A player who is not the auctioneer of an existing Auction
> > specified by this rule C
Good idea! Minor comments on the second one:
> A player who is not the auctioneer of an existing Auction
> specified by this rule CAN, by announcement, initiate an auction
> with emself as the auctioneer The lots, minimum bid, and currency
> of the Auction shall be set by said player.
- This says
On Nov 27, 2008, at 2:15 AM, Pavitra wrote:
of geeksquee(*), on my part at least, would be lost by its removal.
(*) I just invented this word because I couldn't think of one to mean
what I meant: the feeling of inordinate glee you get from an obscure
reference, like that one time on Family Guy w
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 09:19 +1100, Michael Norrish wrote:
> Nonetheless, I don't actually have a problem with your example
> involving ais523. Perhaps this is because it's not much of a name.
> If you put "Bill" in for ais523, my sensibilities might be more
> offended.
As a data point, ais523 refe
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 27 Nov 2008, at 22:19, Michael Norrish wrote:
>
>> Perhaps this is because it's not much of a name.
>
> It was apparently assigned by a computer from their initials,
Whose initials?
...oh.
On 27 Nov 2008, at 22:19, Michael Norrish wrote:
Perhaps this is because it's not much of a name.
It was apparently assigned by a computer from their initials,
so that's not very surprising.
[[I change my nick to a9*&D(987([EMAIL PROTECTED](~``bz. My gender is !&%~F
vZ.]]
comex wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now can we get rid of Spivak?
I second this motion. It worked for B.
"they" is fine for unknown referents, but I'm not going to say "I
transfer a prop to ais523 because they did a fine job in their
judgemen
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 10:19:56 pm Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 16:04, Elliott Hird
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 26 Nov 2008, at 22:41, Michael Norrish wrote:
> >> I've never used Spivak by choice. English has perfectly good
> >> gender-neutral third person singular
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Now can we get rid of Spivak?
> I second this motion. It worked for B.
"they" is fine for unknown referents, but I'm not going to say "I
transfer a prop to ais523 because they did a fine job in their
judgement".
We could
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 16:04, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26 Nov 2008, at 22:41, Michael Norrish wrote:
>
>> I've never used Spivak by choice. English has perfectly good
>> gender-neutral third person singular pronouns: "they", "them" etc. (Nor are
>> these some kind of PC inven
On 26 Nov 2008, at 22:41, Michael Norrish wrote:
I've never used Spivak by choice. English has perfectly good
gender-neutral third person singular pronouns: "they", "them" etc.
(Nor are these some kind of PC invention of the 20th century; they
occur used in this way in Shakespeare, the Ki
Elliott Hird wrote:
On 26 Nov 2008, at 04:46, Pavitra wrote:
On Tuesday 25 November 2008 01:27:59 pm Elliott Hird wrote:
time, unless the winner has transferred the VP to him.
Y'know, you B players really need to get used to the way we use
pronouns around here.
I started playing B much aft
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I started playing B much after Agora.
>
> I do not like Spivak.
Funny, I started playing B much before Agora.
When it used Spivak.
On 26 Nov 2008, at 04:46, Pavitra wrote:
On Tuesday 25 November 2008 01:27:59 pm Elliott Hird wrote:
time, unless the winner has transferred the VP to him.
Y'know, you B players really need to get used to the way we use
pronouns around here.
I started playing B much after Agora.
I do not l
On Tuesday 25 November 2008 01:27:59 pm Elliott Hird wrote:
> time, unless the winner has transferred the VP to him.
Y'know, you B players really need to get used to the way we use
pronouns around here.
On 25 Nov 2008, at 19:26, Elliott Hird wrote:
I publicly pledge that, where the winning bidder is defined as the
Vote Market party who, at the end of 5 days after this pledge was
made:
I terminate that pledge.
I publicly pledge that, where the winning bidder is defined as the
Vote Market part
21 matches
Mail list logo
