On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:26 PM, scshunt <scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>
> I CFJ {Declaring one's intent to perform a dependent action is, in itself,
> an action.}
>
> Arguments:
> I don't really see anything that directly supports this interpretation,
> but I do not see anything that directly contradicts it either.
>
> It's worth noting that anyone can intend to perform any action and only
> the performance of the action is restricted by the rules - it is possible
> to intend something impossible and later make good on the intent when it is
> possible.I think there's a pretty strong argument for IRRELEVANT. As you said, the intent doesn't matter, and if I say "with support I intend...", it works whether or not intending is an action or I actually got support because I can intend by announcement. I suppose it would make a difference if I attempted to make an intent conditionally based on a statement that would be an unreasonable condition in normal communication...
