On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 17:28 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Quazie wrote:
Also, what does the membership of bayes look like?
I think it's terminated due to insufficient membership for a
non-pledge.
The relevant text from Bayes:
{{{
8. Persons CANNOT become party to this contract by announcement.
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 17:28 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Quazie wrote:
Also, what does the membership of bayes look like?
I think it's terminated due to insufficient membership for a
non-pledge.
The relevant text from Bayes:
2009/5/27 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 17:28 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Quazie wrote:
Also, what does the membership of bayes look like?
I think it's terminated due to insufficient
Sent from my iPhone
On May 25, 2009, at 9:49 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I intend, with Agoran consent, to cause Human Point Two to register.
What Rule says you can act on behalf of HP2 to register emself with
Agoran consent?
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Due to Proposal 6320, Human Point Two is no longer a person, but
is still a contract and the judge of CFJ 2521 (Rule 1868: Being
unqualified to be assigned as a judge does not inherently prevent
an entity from continuing
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 18:49 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Due to Proposal 6320, Human Point Two is no longer a person, but
is still a contract and the judge of CFJ 2521 (Rule 1868: Being
unqualified to be assigned as a judge does not inherently prevent
an entity from continuing to be judge of a case
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 14:57 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 18:49 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Due to Proposal 6320, Human Point Two is no longer a person, but
is still a contract and the judge of CFJ 2521 (Rule 1868: Being
unqualified to be assigned as a judge does not inherently
comex wrote:
On May 25, 2009, at 9:49 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I intend, with Agoran consent, to cause Human Point Two to register.
What Rule says you can act on behalf of HP2 to register emself with
Agoran consent?
If I am a party by then, then I can act on behalf of
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
On May 25, 2009, at 9:49 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I intend, with Agoran consent, to cause Human Point Two to register.
What Rule says you can act on behalf of HP2 to register emself with
Agoran
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 18:14 -0400, Quazie wrote:
On behalf of hp2:
Hp2 intends to register with agoran consent.
I consent.
I ask nicely that you let it. Its been around for a while, its not
doing any harm.
Murphy is now a member.
Also, what does the membership of bayes look like?
Just
2009/5/27 Quazie quazieno...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Benjamin Schultz ke...@verizon.net wrote:
On May 25, 2009, at 9:49 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
I request the consent of OscarMeyr and Quazie to become party to
Human Point Two.
I intend, with Agoran consent, to cause Human
2009/5/26 Quazie quazieno...@gmail.com:
I ask nicely that you let it. Its been around for a while, its not
doing any harm.
Acting as a simple shill partnership is harm.
ais523 wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 18:14 -0400, Quazie wrote:
On behalf of hp2:
Hp2 intends to register with agoran consent.
I consent.
NttPF. (If you've already TTttPF'ed, then ignore this; I'm just
filing the relevant messages during the four-day waiting period.)
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
2009/5/27 Quazie quazieno...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Benjamin Schultz ke...@verizon.net wrote:
On May 25, 2009, at 9:49 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
I request the consent of OscarMeyr and Quazie to become party to
Human Point Two.
I intend, with Agoran
14 matches
Mail list logo
