DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration

2023-06-13 Thread Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
Forbidden vacation :o have a good one and good luck! I will do my best to change everything for the worse! >:) tir. 13. jun. 2023, 5:49 a.m. skrev nix via agora-business < agora-busin...@agoranomic.org>: > I deregister. I'm not really playing, or interested in playing, > currently. No big

DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration

2018-03-01 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Alexis Hunt wrote: I've just been hospitalized for an unknown amount of time; I will not be about to play in that time. Apologies. I deregister. Best wishes for a speedy recovery. Ørjan.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration

2018-03-01 Thread Corona
I wish you a quick recovery. ~Corona​ On 04:22, Mar 1, 2018, at 04:22, Cuddle Beam wrote: >I hope you get better soon > >On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 2:32 AM, Ned Strange >wrote: > >> Hope you're alright, Alexis :(. >> >> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:08

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration

2018-02-28 Thread Cuddle Beam
I hope you get better soon On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 2:32 AM, Ned Strange wrote: > Hope you're alright, Alexis :(. > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > I've just been hospitalized for an unknown amount of time; I will not be > >

DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration

2018-02-28 Thread Ned Strange
Hope you're alright, Alexis :(. On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > I've just been hospitalized for an unknown amount of time; I will not be > about to play in that time. Apologies. I deregister. > > Alexis -- >From V.J. Rada

DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration

2018-02-28 Thread Kerim Aydin
All the best for a good outcome, Alexis. On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Alexis Hunt wrote: > I've just been hospitalized for an unknown amount of time; I will not be > about to play in that time. Apologies. I deregister. > > Alexis >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration

2017-10-05 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > I am well aware of that :). G. has been around in various forms since > 2002, right? February 2002 (though I was in 1992-93 Nomic World too). To show how old that is in Internet time, I (and several others) joined Agora after it was mentioned in a Slashdot

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration

2017-10-05 Thread VJ Rada
I am well aware of that :). G. has been around in various forms since 2002, right? On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > Of course, many of us (including me) have registered multiple times in the > past. > > Gaelan > >> On Oct 4, 2017, at 10:56 PM, Owen

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration

2017-10-05 Thread Gaelan Steele
Of course, many of us (including me) have registered multiple times in the past. Gaelan > On Oct 4, 2017, at 10:56 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > >> On Oct 5, 2017, at 1:44 AM, VJ Rada wrote: >> >> Without objection, I intend to deregister our longest

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration

2017-10-04 Thread VJ Rada
Ah yep, and Aris and Celestial Firefox are both from 2016. On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > >> On Oct 5, 2017, at 1:44 AM, VJ Rada wrote: >> >> Without objection, I intend to deregister our longest standing player, >> Murphy. >> >> If

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration (of others)

2017-09-05 Thread Ørjan Johansen
NTTPF Greetings, Ørjan. On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, V.J Rada wrote: Finally I intend to deregister sproklem w/o objection

DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration (of others)

2017-09-05 Thread V.J Rada
Finally I intend to deregister sproklem w/o objection

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration and Assets

2017-05-24 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Could an organization charter or contract serve as a backing document? Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Josh T > wrote: > >> An asset

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration and Assets

2017-05-24 Thread Aris Merchant
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Josh T wrote: >> An asset is an entity defined as such by a rule (hereafter its backing >> document), and existing solely because its backing document defines its >> existence. > So no organization can define and issue assets, for

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration and Assets

2017-05-24 Thread Aris Merchant
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > On 05/23/2017 11:01 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: >> >> I'm quite skeptical of this. I've put a lot of time into the current >> Assets proposal, and feel like "Defin[ing] Assets very simply" would >> have significant disadvantages

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration and Assets

2017-05-23 Thread Josh T
> An asset is an entity defined as such by a rule (hereafter its backing > document), and existing solely because its backing document defines its existence. So no organization can define and issue assets, for example? > If an asset's backing document restricts its ownership to a class of

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration and Assets

2017-05-23 Thread Nic Evans
On 05/23/2017 11:01 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: I'm quite skeptical of this. I've put a lot of time into the current Assets proposal, and feel like "Defin[ing] Assets very simply" would have significant disadvantages in several respects. I think I'd have trouble convincing people to implement

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration and Assets

2017-05-23 Thread Aris Merchant
I'm quite skeptical of this. I've put a lot of time into the current Assets proposal, and feel like "Defin[ing] Assets very simply" would have significant disadvantages in several respects. I think I'd have trouble convincing people to implement another system once we have one up and running,

DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration and Assets

2017-05-23 Thread Nic Evans
Looking back at Assets v3 and forward to current events, I think we should: -Define Assets very simply, distinguishing fungible and nonfungible -Replace balance with a more generic asset switch (which applies to organizations, agora, and *persons*) -Redefine trade and heirs to work for all

DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration and Assets

2017-05-23 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Tue, 23 May 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: "Heir" is a person switch, tracked by the Registrar, whose value is either Agora (the default value), or a player other than emself, or an Organization. A player may flip eir Heir by announcement. That "emself" seems to be a bit fishy grammar

DIS: Re: BUS: deregistration intents

2010-06-11 Thread Ed Murphy
Wooble wrote: I intend, without objection, to deregister each of the following players: ehird Ienpew III Phoenix Sgeo Taral I object to deregistering Taral.

DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration

2009-04-14 Thread Elliott Hird
2009/4/14 Schrodinger's Cat schrodingers.kat...@gmail.com: I object. -- -- Schrodinger's Cat I wish inactives would stop objecting to their inactivation.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration

2009-04-14 Thread Ian Kelly
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: 2009/4/14 Schrodinger's Cat schrodingers.kat...@gmail.com: I object. -- -- Schrodinger's Cat I wish inactives would stop objecting to their inactivation. Why? Their presence doesn't affect anything. If

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration

2009-04-14 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote: I wish inactives would stop objecting to their inactivation. Why?  Their presence doesn't affect anything.  If it does, it's probably a bug. Well, objecting to deactivation affects the quorum. Objecting to

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration

2009-04-14 Thread Elliott Hird
2009/4/14 comex com...@gmail.com: [Repeal partnerships.  Repeal playership and fall back to activity; everyone is a player.  This allows a more natural entrance to the game.  It's radical, but nomic is all about challenging the traditional notion of a game: why can't everyone be a player?]

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration

2009-04-14 Thread Alex Smith
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 22:54 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote: 2009/4/14 comex com...@gmail.com: [Repeal partnerships. Repeal playership and fall back to activity; everyone is a player. This allows a more natural entrance to the game. It's radical, but nomic is all about challenging the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration

2009-04-14 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: 2009/4/14 Schrodinger's Cat schrodingers.kat...@gmail.com: I object. -- -- Schrodinger's Cat I wish inactives would stop

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration

2009-04-14 Thread Ian Kelly
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: Yes it does. Schrodinger's Cat is the longest name of any first-class player. It's annoying as far as the Registrar's report is concerned. Tom's is longer. -root

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration

2009-04-14 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: Yes it does. Schrodinger's Cat is the longest name of any first-class player. It's annoying as far as the Registrar's report is concerned.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deregistration

2009-04-14 Thread Ian Kelly
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: Yes it does. Schrodinger's Cat is the longest name of any