Could an organization charter or contract serve as a backing document?
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Josh T
> wrote:
> >> An asset is an entity defined as such b
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Josh T wrote:
>> An asset is an entity defined as such by a rule (hereafter its backing
>> document), and existing solely because its backing document defines its
>> existence.
> So no organization can define and issue assets, for example?
No, although they're free
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
> On 05/23/2017 11:01 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
>>
>> I'm quite skeptical of this. I've put a lot of time into the current
>> Assets proposal, and feel like "Defin[ing] Assets very simply" would
>> have significant disadvantages in several respects.
> An asset is an entity defined as such by a rule (hereafter its backing
> document),
and existing solely because its backing document defines its existence.
So no organization can define and issue assets, for example?
> If an asset's backing document restricts its ownership to a class of
entitie
On 05/23/2017 11:01 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
I'm quite skeptical of this. I've put a lot of time into the current
Assets proposal, and feel like "Defin[ing] Assets very simply" would
have significant disadvantages in several respects. I think I'd have
trouble convincing people to implement anothe
I'm quite skeptical of this. I've put a lot of time into the current
Assets proposal, and feel like "Defin[ing] Assets very simply" would
have significant disadvantages in several respects. I think I'd have
trouble convincing people to implement another system once we have one
up and running, despi
Looking back at Assets v3 and forward to current events, I think we should:
-Define Assets very simply, distinguishing fungible and nonfungible
-Replace balance with a more generic asset switch (which applies to
organizations, agora, and *persons*)
-Redefine trade and heirs to work for all as
On Tue, 23 May 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
"Heir" is a person switch, tracked by the Registrar, whose value is
either Agora (the default value), or a player other than emself, or
an Organization. A player may flip eir Heir by announcement.
That "emself" seems to be a bit fishy grammar wit
Sorry to not get on this until now. I'd be down with a rule that defined a
word "Assets" perhaps, and note that Shinies and Estates are both
considered Assets. Then the amendments would be easier to make in the
future, we would just have to edit the concept of 'Assets' and the two
rules would cat
9 matches
Mail list logo
