Warrigal wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 12:31 Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
You kids and your timely fashions. When I was young, we did things as soon
as possible both ways and we liked it!
You know, I *still* think of VVLOP and second-class
On 2/6/20 7:26 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
> I object to the lists one because the example given is very confusing.
> It's not an inline list because it's separated from the surrounding
> prose, and it's not a block list because the elements aren't separated
> by line breaks.
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 22:06, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 2/6/20 7:47 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote:
> > "I intend, with Agoran consent, to enact the following Editorial
> > Guidelines:"
> >
> > does not seem like multiple separate intents.
>
>
> Whoops, you're right.
On 2/6/20 7:47 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote:
> "I intend, with Agoran consent, to enact the following Editorial Guidelines:"
>
> does not seem like multiple separate intents.
Whoops, you're right. I was thinking the rule said CAN enact a
(singular) Guideline, not CAN enact (plural)
I wrote:
> I object to the capitalisation one for the same reason as Alexis.
>
> I object to the lists one because the example given is very confusing.
> It's not an inline list because it's separated from the surrounding
> prose, and it's not a block list because the elements aren't separated
>
On 1/30/2020 3:44 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Thu., Jan. 30, 2020, 06:08 AIS523 wrote:
>> I should note, though, that "in a timely fashion" is a relatively new
>> phrasing. For a long time, the standard phrasing was "as soon as
>> possible" (which was nonetheless defined to mean "within seven
On Thu., Jan. 30, 2020, 06:08 AIS523--- via agora-discussion, <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 17:25 +, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-
> discussion wrote:
> > Aris wrote:
> > > For the record, I strongly disagree. I think Spivak is part of Agoran
> > > culture
On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 17:25 +, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-
discussion wrote:
> Aris wrote:
> > For the record, I strongly disagree. I think Spivak is part of Agoran
> > culture at this point, like the “or” suffixes at the end of offices. It’s
> > part of what makes Agora different and unique.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 12:31 Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> You kids and your timely fashions. When I was young, we did things as soon
> as possible both ways and we liked it!
>
You know, I *still* think of VVLOP and second-class persons (and
On 1/29/2020 9:25 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> (then again, there's also this:)
>
>> Judgments in Nomic are not bound by rules of precedent, for that would
>> require a daunting amount of record-keeping for each game.
Well, e's not wrong...
On 1/29/2020 9:32 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On 1/29/2020 9:25 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
>> (then again, there's also this:)
>>
>>> Judgments in Nomic are not bound by rules of precedent, for that would
>>> require a daunting amount of record-keeping for each game.
>
>
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 12:25, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Aris wrote:
> > For the record, I strongly disagree. I think Spivak is part of Agoran
> > culture at this point, like the “or” suffixes at the end of offices. It’s
> > part of what
Aris wrote:
> For the record, I strongly disagree. I think Spivak is part of Agoran
> culture at this point, like the “or” suffixes at the end of offices. It’s
> part of what makes Agora different and unique. In short, it’s a dialectal
> variation, and I think Agora having its own dialect, not
> On Jan 29, 2020, at 8:25 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 2:23 AM omd via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 9:07 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>> Personally, I’m vaguely
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 2:23 AM omd via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 9:07 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > Personally, I’m vaguely of the opinion that we should switch to
> they/them instead of Spivak in general. Our use
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 10:23, omd via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 9:07 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > Personally, I’m vaguely of the opinion that we should switch to they/them
> > instead of Spivak in general. Our use of Spivak now feels like using
> >
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 9:07 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Personally, I’m vaguely of the opinion that we should switch to they/them
> instead of Spivak in general. Our use of Spivak now feels like using Betamax
> in 1990—sure, it was probably better, but the other one won and
It is interesting to consider changing our use of pronouns, but if
we're not changing anything, is there any reason to cover pronouns in
the editorial guidelines at all? I don't see any confusion or
inconsistency related to them, and I expect any new player who has
given the rules even a cursory
This is a good point. Suggested reword: {
The singular non-gendered pronoun is "e" in the nominative, and "em" in
the accusative. Do not use "he/him/his," or "she/her/her,” or “they/them/their”
as a singular pronoun when referring to a person of unknown gender.
}
Personally, I’m vaguely of the
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020, 18:43 Jason Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> [Informal title: "Pronouns"]
>
> {
>
> The singular non-gendered pronoun is "e" in the nominative, and "em" in
> the accusative. Do not use "they" as a singular pronoun. Do not use
> "he/him/his"
20 matches
Mail list logo
