On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> >I disagree because of the fact that this is a game. While we have a fair
> >notion of ethics/justice here, principled voting is hindered by the
> generally
> >feeling on one side of "it's just a game and what e did is no big deal and
> >was kinda cool why
>I disagree because of the fact that this is a game. While we have a fair
>notion of ethics/justice here, principled voting is hindered by the
generally
>feeling on one side of "it's just a game and what e did is no big deal and
>was kinda cool why should I bother to vote to punish" and on the
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> > Right now our pledge system is based on bills of attainder (or more
> > correctly bills of pains and penalties), rather than justice.
>
> A further note: seperation of powers is a terrible, terrible, terrible idea
> in a system in which the legislative
> Right now our pledge system is based on bills of attainder (or more
> correctly bills of pains and penalties), rather than justice.
A further note: seperation of powers is a terrible, terrible, terrible idea
in a system in which the legislative power is exercised by everybody and
the judicial
On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 2:20 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> > > I support: I didn't pay for the Estate.
> > >
> > > Pledges are great right now! I love them. The "explicit restatement" rule
> >
It's better than the punishment for literally every other offense, which is
basically the King delivering judgement (3 times a week on eir own
initiative and the rest when called upon by only one person) with no
opportunity for defense.
If we get comprehensive criminal CFJs, we can ditch current
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 2:20 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> > I support: I didn't pay for the Estate.
> >
> > Pledges are great right now! I love them. The "explicit restatement" rule
> > should be removed though.
>
> I agree I prefer a
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> I support: I didn't pay for the Estate.
>
> Pledges are great right now! I love them. The "explicit restatement" rule
> should be removed though.
I agree I prefer a lightweight, straightforward, relatively easy-to-track
(and free!) option instead of
I support: I didn't pay for the Estate.
Pledges are great right now! I love them. The "explicit restatement" rule
should be removed though.
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You didn't explicitly restate the reasons, so that failed.
You didn't explicitly restate the reasons, so that failed. Also, that
requirement is silly. Is everyone willing to just replace pledges with
a special kind of contracts?
-Aris
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 2:07 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> I support.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:05
Makes sense.
On 11/18/2017 4:53 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
On 11/18/2017 4:38 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
I pledgw that I paid for the Estate of Dawsburgen.
On Nov 18, 2017, at 4:47 PM, ATMunn wrote:
What do you mean by pledging that you did something?
Under the current rules, pledges don’t do
On 11/18/2017 4:38 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> I pledgw that I paid for the Estate of Dawsburgen.
On Nov 18, 2017, at 4:47 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> What do you mean by pledging that you did something?
Under the current rules, pledges don’t do anything on their own, and there’s no
formal connection
On Sat, 2017-11-18 at 16:47 -0500, ATMunn wrote:
> What do you mean by pledging that you did something?
A pledge is basically like a promise. You can make promises about
things that happened in the past in addition to things that will happen
in the future, so I don't see why pledges would be any
Means if the CFJ is judged past the statute of limitations, y'all can still
call it in & punish me.
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 8:47 AM, ATMunn wrote:
> What do you mean by pledging that you did something?
>
>
> On 11/18/2017 4:38 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
>> Yes, I will wait
>>
What do you mean by pledging that you did something?
On 11/18/2017 4:38 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
Yes, I will wait
That reminds me? I think the statute of limitatins has passed since I may
have failed to pay for that estate. I pledgw that I paid for the Estate of
Dawsburgen. Also, what happened to
Yes, I will wait
That reminds me? I think the statute of limitatins has passed since I may
have failed to pay for that estate. I pledgw that I paid for the Estate of
Dawsburgen. Also, what happened to that CFJ?
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 5:43 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> If the
16 matches
Mail list logo