comex wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:58 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
For the second motion, all voters (myself, comex, BobTHJ) voted FOR.
CoE: I voted AGAINST; I think someone else did as well. Unfortunately
it looks
That's recorded in the above history, as well as my later retraction
(in response to the AAA motion that would make it unnecessary).
Sent from my iPhone
On May 21, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
comex wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:58 AM, comex com...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 07:52, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I act on behalf of the IBA to intend, with Agoran Consent, to register.
I
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:16 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
}}
I initiate a Motion to Amend the IBA, with the following amendment:
...
parties. If this contract is ever not a player, any person CAN act on
its behalf to intend to register and CAN act on its behalf to register.
AGAINST, I
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:35 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
A person CAN deposit an asset by transferring it to the IBA; e then
gains the Effective Rate in zorkmids.
The Effective Rate for a deposit is its Rate, multiplied by a value
depending on the number of previous deposits made in the
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:35 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree to the following contract:
Looks good. I'd like to see something like this:
If a player votes KILL on a Motion, eir vote is counted as a vote
AGAINST that Motion. Additionally, if the Motion passes, then:
a) If that player
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
If a player votes KILL on a Motion, eir vote is counted as a vote
AGAINST that Motion. Additionally, if the Motion passes, then:
a) If that player has no pending Offers, then e ceases to become a
party to the contract at the same
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:54 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm. As long as the vote collector (currently the initiator of the
motion, by default) is required to prominently mention who left, I'm
okay with it, although I don't think it's very likely that a Terrible
Motion will pass.
True.
8 matches
Mail list logo
