Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Getting in on Agencies

I probably should have also tested the directional control characters and a right-to-left language, but there's only so much you can fit in three words. Congratulations on your script being otherwise pretty much Unicode 5.0 compliant! (For reference, Unicode 10 is expected to be finalized later

DIS: Re: BUS: Getting in on Agencies

Note: Thanks for helping me test my script for unicode compliance - delighted that no changes were necessary to handle your unicode. On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:10 PM Josh T wrote: > I resolve my quoted intention and establish the agency therein. > > 天火狐 > > On 22 May

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Getting in on Agencies

Here's a picture from my client for reference: https://goo.gl/k21bMf 天火狐 On 22 May 2017 at 15:41, CuddleBeam wrote: > I think that's a very good idea! > > When I read this on the archives or attempt to see the message in my gmail > interface I see boxes instead of

DIS: Re: BUS: Getting in on Agencies

That's right. Specifically, this is an agency that allows people to refer to it by another name consequence-free. 天火狐 On 22 May 2017 at 15:39, Quazie wrote: > So this is an agency that allows you to refer to this agency? > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:33 Josh T

DIS: Re: BUS: Getting in on Agencies

I think that's a very good idea! When I read this on the archives or attempt to see the message in my gmail interface I see boxes instead of certain characters tho