On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 08:30 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Your choice, ais523. I just hadn't reached the end of messages before
> > favoring. I don't have any preconceived brilliant notion in mind, but
> > if you post consent I'm happy to do it. -G.
>
> I
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 08:30 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Your choice, ais523. I just hadn't reached the end of messages before
> favoring. I don't have any preconceived brilliant notion in mind, but
> if you post consent I'm happy to do it. -G.
I'll judge it if necessary, but suspect you'd be l
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Pavitra wrote:
> On 10/21/2011 10:18 AM, ais523 wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 08:12 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, John Smith wrote:
> >>> I initiate a criminal case.
> >>> The Accused is omd (known elsewhere as comex)
> >>> I allege that the Accu
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 16:25 +0100, ais523 wrote:
> Ah, he we go; I consent to G./eelpout transferring CFJ 3107 to emself,
> if e judges it in the same message.
That's meant to read "here we go", ofc. "he" is not a word.
--
ais523
On 10/21/2011 10:18 AM, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 08:12 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, John Smith wrote:
>>> I initiate a criminal case.
>>> The Accused is omd (known elsewhere as comex)
>>> I allege that the Accused has stirred up prejudice and ill-will against
>
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 08:12 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, John Smith wrote:
> > I initiate a criminal case.
> > The Accused is omd (known elsewhere as comex)
> > I allege that the Accused has stirred up prejudice and ill-will against
> > Agora among the Artists of Blognomic b
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> You cannot just accuse someone of violating the rules
> based on a whimsical umbrella statement without an actual concrete
> violation.
You CAN; it's possible that you SHALL NOT (although I think the Libel
rule is gone) and you probably SHOU
On 10/20/2011 10:14 PM, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 21 October 2011 04:08, Elliott Hird
> wrote:
>> Arguments:
>
> More arguments:
>
> Judge ais523's example hypothetical violation of that clause in eir
> judgement of CFJ 2515 was "to bring Agora into sufficient disrepute
> that playing nomic was
On 21 October 2011 04:08, Elliott Hird wrote:
> Arguments:
More arguments:
Judge ais523's example hypothetical violation of that clause in eir
judgement of CFJ 2515 was "to bring Agora into sufficient disrepute
that playing nomic was made illegal in a real-world country"; the
alleged violation h
On 10/20/2011 10:05 PM, John Smith wrote:
> I initiate a criminal case.
Gratuitous arguments:
The crux of the caller's argument is this:
> CfJ 2515 found that bringing Agora into disrepute would violate rule
> 101. The Accused has most certainly done so.
Opinions on a scam still in progress may
On 21 October 2011 04:05, John Smith wrote:
> The Accused is omd (known elsewhere as comex)
> I allege that the Accused has stirred up prejudice and ill-will against
> Agora among the Artists of Blognomic by sending the message quoted in
> Evidence to a public forum and several members of Blognomi
On 10/20/2011 08:44 PM, omd wrote:
> VOTE FOR OUR CFJ
> (http://blognomic.com/archive/cfj_attn_cotc/) by posting a comment
> containing ":FOR:"!
Please also vote :AGAINST: the defense CFJs:
http://blognomic.com/archive/emergency_law/
http://blognomic.com/archive/emergency_law_patch/
12 matches
Mail list logo
