On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would disagree. The contract reads:
>
> 15. Creating proposals or CFJs for the clear and primary purpose of
> Harvesting the ID numbers assigned is a breach of this contract.
>
> It doesn't specify who will be doing the har
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:08 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gratuitous arguments:
>
> tusho forgot e was a member of the AAA, and therefore is unlikely to
> have created the CFJs for the putpose of harvesting the ID numbers
> assigned. I argue that tusho created the CFJs so that /someone e
Goethe wrote:
> I'd better switch myself to hemming and hawing. I do so. -Goethe
This was a no-op, you already were h-and-h.
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 September 2008 03:36:00 pm comex wrote:
>> I initiate an equity case with respect to the AAA. The state of
>> affairs by which events have not proceeded as envisioned by the
>> contract is that tusho has violated section 15 of the AAA agreem
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 03:36:00 pm comex wrote:
> I initiate an equity case with respect to the AAA. The state of
> affairs by which events have not proceeded as envisioned by the
> contract is that tusho has violated section 15 of the AAA agreement:
>
> 15. Creating proposals or CFJs for
2008/9/3 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> what? Since when am I an AAA party?
>
> Here it is:
Psht. Why on earth did I do that.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what? Since when am I an AAA party?
Here it is:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/12 ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/9/3 Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> As a matter of fact, I don't think violating AAA paragraph 15 is
>> prop-worthy. I transfer one prop from myself (because the situation
>> ihope anticipated isn't occurring; effecti
2008/9/3 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes, you are.
>
> BobTHJ
>
Wtf. I explicitly didn't care about the AAA and didn't want part
in its shenanigans. If this was a criminal CFJ I imagine it'd be
UNAWARE.
2008/9/3 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So:
>
> I initiate an equity case with respect to the AAA. The state of
> affairs by which events have not proceeded as envisioned by the
> contract is that tusho has violated section 15 of the AAA agreement:
>
> 15. Creating proposals or CFJs for the clear an
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/9/3 Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> As a matter of fact, I don't think violating AAA paragraph 15 is
>> prop-worthy. I transfer one prop from myself (because the situation
>> ihope anticipated isn't occurring; effecti
2008/9/3 Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As a matter of fact, I don't think violating AAA paragraph 15 is
> prop-worthy. I transfer one prop from myself (because the situation
> ihope anticipated isn't occurring; effectively, from tusho because e
> is spamming CFJs) to H. CotC Murphy (because tus
12 matches
Mail list logo
