On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18 Nov 2008, at 16:41, Zefram wrote:
>> Elliott Hird wrote:
>>> Therefore, Agora acknowledges that a nomic ruleset can have a
>>> jurisdiction
>>> larger than the domain of the game it defines the rules for.
>>
>> Not in
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 18 Nov 2008, at 16:41, Zefram wrote:
>> Not in general, no. That judgement is only that Agoran rules have
>> infinite scope.
>
> Well that's very fair to other nomics ... perhaps we should platonically
> declare that all nomics are Protectorates?
Ref
Elliott Hird wrote:
>perhaps we should platonically
>declare that all nomics are Protectorates?
We could, but it doesn't seem very useful.
>Nothing in the laws of physics gives effect to the rules of Agora.
Agora doesn't need the approval of the laws of physics. Agora is sovereign.
-zefram
On 18 Nov 2008, at 16:41, Zefram wrote:
Elliott Hird wrote:
Therefore, Agora acknowledges that a nomic ruleset can have a
jurisdiction
larger than the domain of the game it defines the rules for.
Not in general, no. That judgement is only that Agoran rules have
infinite scope.
Well that's
Elliott Hird wrote:
>Therefore, Agora acknowledges that a nomic ruleset can have a
>jurisdiction
>larger than the domain of the game it defines the rules for.
Not in general, no. That judgement is only that Agoran rules have
infinite scope.
>So, I'm starting a new game of nomic! Here are the r
5 matches
Mail list logo