DIS: Re: BUS: Linked CFJs

2007-05-14 Thread Michael Slone
On 5/14/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Immediately after Goethe's message with Message-ID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, one or more of (GreyKnight, Levi, Manu, Maud, sproingie) were Partners as described by the Pineapple Partnership agreement. * Immedi

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Linked CFJs

2007-05-14 Thread Ed Murphy
Zefram wrote: Ed Murphy wrote: I submit the following linked CFJs, barring Zefram, Goethe, and the Pineapple Partnership: You've thus barred all the players that you could be sure would have the knowledge necessary to judge the CFJs. Pessimal. Well, you don't expect me to make it easy, do

DIS: Re: BUS: Linked CFJs

2007-05-14 Thread Zefram
Ed Murphy wrote: >I submit the following linked CFJs, barring Zefram, Goethe, and the >Pineapple Partnership: You've thus barred all the players that you could be sure would have the knowledge necessary to judge the CFJs. Pessimal. -zefram

DIS: Re: BUS: Linked CFJs

2006-09-18 Thread Kerim Aydin
Murphy wrote: Rule 698 (Always an Eligible Judge) was silent on the eligibility of non-active players before the adoption of Proposal 4867, and remained silent after its adoption. Whups! Missed deleting the word "active" in several places, and now there's no ruleset definition. CFJs 1500 and