Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Making an Oath

Actually, no it doesn't since, at the time of initiation of the CFJ you still COULD impose the Cold hand of Justice. Jason Cobb On 7/24/19 2:48 AM, Jason Cobb wrote: Hmm... well that breaks things. Jason Cobb On 7/24/19 2:45 AM, Rebecca wrote: I find this finger pointing SHENANIGANS

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Making an Oath

Hmm... well that breaks things. Jason Cobb On 7/24/19 2:45 AM, Rebecca wrote: I find this finger pointing SHENANIGANS because whatever the result, I don't think I can impose a fine of acctual blots here On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:34 PM Jason Cobb wrote: I pledge, under penalty of a Class 0

DIS: Re: BUS: Making an Oath

Wow, I'm an idiot. I guess I have to wait 24 hours for my test, then. Jason Cobb On 7/23/19 2:18 AM, Jason Cobb wrote: Oh, look! The CHoJ actually works again! I pledge not to create any pledges for the next 24 hours.

DIS: Re: BUS: Making an Oath (it's different this time, I swear!)

I'm favoring this one... and I can't think of a past adjudication off the top of my head. On 6/27/2019 8:05 AM, Jason Cobb wrote: I pledge, for the _previous_ 24 hours, not to make any pledges. I point my finger at Jason Cobb for the crime of Oathbreaking, and I throw myself upon the mercy

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Making an Oath

I just wanted to make an easy to break pledge :( Jason Cobb On 6/18/19 9:20 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: On Jun 18, 2019, at 9:11 PM, Rebecca wrote: There is a directly on point CFJ in re pledges and that "no prohibition" clause, that being 3538. For anyone else interested, the archived CFJ is

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Making an Oath

On Jun 18, 2019, at 9:11 PM, Rebecca wrote: > There is a directly on point CFJ in re pledges and that "no prohibition" > clause, that being 3538. For anyone else interested, the archived CFJ is available at

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Making an Oath

There is a directly on point CFJ in re pledges and that "no prohibition" clause, that being 3538. To quote it "I agree that the pledge, if effective, would be a severe enough restriction on V.J. Rada's participation in the Fora as to run afoul of Rule 478 (as even though e is not strictly

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Making an Oath

It doesn’t actually require all capitals. It says "These definitions are used when rule includes a term in all caps, and provide guidance in determining the ordinary-language meaning of a term when a rule includes a term otherwise." So we're allowed (and arguably encouraged) to interpret it as

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Making an Oath

I don't think you can interpret as establishing criminal liability, since it says "shall" and Rule 2152 ("Mother, may I?") specifically requires all capitals ("SHALL"). Jason Cobb On 6/18/19 8:42 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: On Jun 16, 2019, at 12:46 AM, Jason Cobb wrote: I pledge, on penalty

DIS: Re: BUS: Making an Oath

On Jun 16, 2019, at 12:46 AM, Jason Cobb wrote: > I pledge, on penalty of a Class 0 Crime, to not send messages to public fora > for the next 24 hours. Does this pledge operate? Rule 478/34 (Power=3) Fora Freedom of speech being essential for the healthy functioning of any