On 7/31/19 4:42 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
I CFJ this statement: Agora is ossified.
I CFJ this statement: Rule 1698 (Ossification) is in effect.
I favour these CFJs.
I know I've already given gratuitous arguments, but since those ended up
being similar to ais523/Aris's arguments, I don't think
On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 20:07 -0400, D. Margaux wrote:
> Ok--how about this:
>
> ///
> {
> Adopt a proposal with AI and other characteristics minimally
> sufficient to give full effect to its terms, providing as follows:
>
> { The gamestate and ruleset are changed to what they were on 31
>
On 7/31/19 8:07 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
Or what about this:
///
{
Adopt a proposal with AI and other characteristics minimally sufficient to give
full effect to its terms, providing as follows:
{ The gamestate and ruleset are changed to what they were on 31 July 2019.
Then enact a
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 5:07 PM D. Margaux wrote:
> Or what about this:
>
> ///
> {
> Adopt a proposal with AI and other characteristics minimally sufficient to
> give full effect to its terms, providing as follows:
>
> { The gamestate and ruleset are changed to what they were on 31 July
On Jul 31, 2019, at 5:35 PM, "ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk"
wrote:
>> Here's a rule change that is trivially IMPOSSIBLE to enact: "Enact a
>> power 100 Rule that states: 'It is, and always has been, IMPOSSIBLE
>> to enact this rule.'"
> It's not IMPOSSIBLE to enact that in the future. (Agora
On 7/31/19 5:27 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
First, your example here would be an inseparable group of changes that result
in Agora being ossified.
Even if Proposal B depends on Proposal A being previously enacted to
work, they are not inseparable. Proposal A could certainly be ADOPTED
while
On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 17:27 -0400, D. Margaux wrote:
> > On Jul 31, 2019, at 4:54 PM, Jason Cobb
> > wrote:
> >
> > Gratuitous:
> >
> > The 4 week period gives plenty of time for all of these rule
> > changes to be effected in ~2 weeks.
> >
> > Start of Week 0: write proposal that repeals any
> On Jul 31, 2019, at 4:54 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
>
> Gratuitous:
>
> The 4 week period gives plenty of time for all of these rule changes to be
> effected in ~2 weeks.
>
> Start of Week 0: write proposal that repeals any protections (including
> AIAN). Distribute this proposal.
>
> Week
> On Jul 31, 2019, at 4:53 PM, "ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk"
> wrote:
>
> Gratuitous: four weeks is enough time to change the rules such that
> those amendments are possible, and still get in the example proposals
> afterwards. There's no rule that the change has to be accomplished with
> a
9 matches
Mail list logo
