On 29 Nov 2008, at 20:05, Pavitra wrote:
informally request a PBA report sometime soonish
nomic.bob-space.com/agoralog.aspx
by bobthj
I pledged to allow him to publish a report on my behalf. He hasn't yet.
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:59:44 +
Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CFJ: The PRS is a contest
Arguments:
Wooble neat, PRS isn't a contest; Notary is recordkeepor of
contestmasters so ratifying the Scorekeepor report didn't make it a
contest.
Wooble and since the Scorekeepor
On 26 Nov 2008, at 12:12, Joshua Boehme wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:59:44 +
Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CFJ: The PRS is a contest
Arguments:
Wooble neat, PRS isn't a contest; Notary is recordkeepor of
contestmasters so ratifying the Scorekeepor report didn't make it a
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 05:39, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bobthj scammed it as a contest by ratifying scorekeepor's report. Except...
see wooble's quote.
Arguments: The PRS was a contest for quite some time before it ceased
to be one due to a ratification error on the Notary
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Joshua Boehme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I wasn't in on the discussion, could someone provide the context,
please?
That was all of the context, and I was incorrect. The contestmaster
switch is tracked by the Notary, but the list of contestmasters is
part
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
The following sentence is a win announcement, and this sentence serves
to clearly label it as one. ais523 has a score of at least 100.
Therefore, by rule 2187, I satisfy the Winning Condition of High Score;
I do not satisfy any Losing Conditions,
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
with:
The total number of points a player MAY award in a given week
is equal to 5 times the number of first-class players who are
members of contracts for which e is contestmaster. Points up to
this total CAN be awarded by a
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I initiate an equity case regarding the PRS, whose parties are ehird,
BobTHJ, comex, Murphy, Quazie, Wooble, Pavitra, ais523, and root.
ais523 should only have gotten 1 point from the above cashout since e
only had 1 PV. He
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:52, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following sentence is a win announcement, and this sentence serves
to clearly label it as one. ais523 has a score of at least 100.
Therefore, by rule 2187, I satisfy the Winning Condition of High Score;
I do not satisfy
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:52, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following sentence is a win announcement, and this sentence serves
to clearly label it as one. ais523 has a score of at least 100.
Therefore, by rule 2187, I satisfy the Winning
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 15:07, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:52, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following sentence is a win announcement, and this sentence serves
to clearly label it as one. ais523 has a score
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 14:07 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:52, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following sentence is a win announcement, and this sentence serves
to clearly label it as one. ais523 has a score of at least
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 14:07 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
As is, I don't think there's a lot that can be done. The PRS was acting
not-in-accordance-with-expectations due to a mistake, so that can be
solved equitably, but the gamestate will have changed a lot
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I agree that criminal proceedings aren't reasonable, I'm more thinking of
the equity; what is an equitable solution to making a mistake that
resets all other members' points?
ps. Maybe equity would be me putting a big word ILLEGAL next to the win
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I agree that criminal proceedings aren't reasonable, I'm more thinking of
the equity; what is an equitable solution to making a mistake that
resets all other members' points?
ps.
2008/6/28 Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I object.
-zefram
why?
Elliott Hird wrote:
why?
I have a problem with the laundering concept of the PRS. It should not
be granted the ability to award points. Points should only be awarded
for generally-approved subgames, but the PRS would open the way for
anything to grant points.
-zefram
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Elliott Hird wrote:
why?
I have a problem with the laundering concept of the PRS. It should not
be granted the ability to award points. Points should only be awarded
for generally-approved subgames, but the PRS would open the
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:39 AM, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ihope wrote:
Just to speed things along or something, I intend to make the Points
Relay Service a contract with myself as contestmaster without three
objections.
I object.
And here I thought you'd just reposted the same thing 4
I object to ehird's, ihope's, and both of Quazie's attempts to make
the PRS a contest. It would allow contests to persistently exceed the
rules-mandated cap on number of awardable points.
--
Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you.
-- Unknown
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Elliott Hird wrote:
why?
I have a problem with the laundering concept of the PRS. It should not
be granted
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you be a little more specific about what the problem is here? What
about the PRS would you change, or what do you find to be scammable or
unbalanced? The PRS is regulated by the same without three
objections that
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I join the PRS.
2008/6/27 Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I intend to make the Points Relay Service a contract with myself as
contestmaster without three objections.
I object.
I intend to make the Points Relay Service a
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I join the PRS.
2008/6/27 Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I intend to make the Points Relay Service a contract with myself as
contestmaster without three objections.
I object.
I intend to make the Points Relay Service a
2008/6/27 Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It's already a contest.
Ironic.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I join the PRS.
2008/6/27 Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I intend to make the Points Relay Service a contract with myself as
contestmaster without
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/6/27 Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It's already a contest.
Ironic.
Proto-proposal: rename contests to something that doesn't share
most of the same letters with contracts
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/6/27 Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It's already a contest.
Ironic.
Proto-proposal: rename contests to something that doesn't share
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/6/27 Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It's already a contest.
Ironic.
29 matches
Mail list logo
