ehird wrote:
> I retract this CFJ and CFJ on the statement "Warrigal MAY transfer
> assets".
Gratuituous: None of us have access to a proof or disproof of the
Riemann hypothesis, so by Rule 2197 ("its permissibility cannot be
determined with certainty at the time it is attempted") Warrigal's
a
On 7 Dec 2008, at 19:01, Zefram wrote:
UNDETERMINED seems eminently appropriate.
Yay, unknown gamestate.
Elliott Hird wrote:
>I CFJ on the statement "Warrigal is a party to the Wormhole".
UNDETERMINED seems eminently appropriate. Though I'd be tempted to
plump for FALSE, on the grounds that the Riemann hypothesis is true (go
ahead, prove me wrong). OTOH, given that we all know that the truth of
the
On 7 Dec 2008, at 18:12, Elliott Hird wrote:
PARADOX
By which I mean UNDECIDABLE
4 matches
Mail list logo
