Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Registration Prohibits Silent Partners

2007-05-14 Thread Zefram
Ed Murphy wrote: >Zefram's interpretation in CFJ 1623 was that a partnership must >assign rights and obligations to the partners. This could be >extended by interpreting that anyone assigned rights and obligations, >even indirectly, is a partner. I'd say that's the definition of a partner. I'd p

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Registration Prohibits Silent Partners

2007-05-14 Thread Kerim Aydin
Murphy wrote: > In this case, at least, I think it's because the functions in > question (i.e. how many partners does Pineapple have left?) > directly impact the rule-defined gamestate (i.e. does Pineapple > still exist as a player?). My question is, are these matters best dealt with in legislati

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Registration Prohibits Silent Partners

2007-05-14 Thread Ed Murphy
Goethe wrote: Murphy wrote: If such an agreement is registered, then as soon as possible after its membership changes, it shall announce which players have joined and which have left. This requirement is satisfied if the information is published by a member of the agree

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Registration Prohibits Silent Partners

2007-05-14 Thread Kerim Aydin
Murphy wrote: > If such an agreement is registered, then as soon as possible > after its membership changes, it shall announce which players > have joined and which have left. This requirement is satisfied > if the information is published by a member of the agreement, >