On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:00 PM, omd wrote:
> This might work, although I don't see anything particularly broken
> about the current version.
I'm mainly thinking about the confused circumstances surrounding CFJ
3244. No harm was done, but I still think the current state of affairs
seems undesirab
On Apr 10, 2013 4:02 PM, "omd" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Tanner Swett
wrote:
> > I submit a proposal, titled "Seventy-Three Ninety-Five": In Rule 2367
> > "Messy Statements", replace "inaccurate and incorrect" with
> > "nonsensical and meaningless".
> >
> > Arguments: considerin
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> I submit a proposal, titled "Seventy-Three Ninety-Five": In Rule 2367
> "Messy Statements", replace "inaccurate and incorrect" with
> "nonsensical and meaningless".
>
> Arguments: considering both a statement and its negation to be
> meaningfu
3 matches
Mail list logo
