Eris wrote:
On 3/9/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quazie wrote:
> This is exactly the type of change I was talking about, I just have
> never understood the CFJ system enough to write it myself.
Eris, may I publish that short list of bullet points you sent me
about a conceptual reva
On 3/9/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quazie wrote:
> This is exactly the type of change I was talking about, I just have
> never understood the CFJ system enough to write it myself.
Eris, may I publish that short list of bullet points you sent me
about a conceptual revamping of the j
Quazie wrote:
This is exactly the type of change I was talking about, I just have
never understood the CFJ system enough to write it myself.
Eris, may I publish that short list of bullet points you sent me
about a conceptual revamping of the judiciary?
This is exactly the type of change I was talking about, I just have never
understood the CFJ system enough to write it myself.
On 3/8/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Proto: Conflict of interest
[Simple and flexible fix]
Amend rule 1868 (Selecting a Judge) by appending the followi
4 matches
Mail list logo
