Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [s-b] [Notary] Report (null)

2009-05-21 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Benjamin Caplan celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote: I believe that the intent to use Agoran jurisdiction must be unambiguous. So, saying I pledge to ASAP transfer a 7 Crop to you in ##nomic would probably create an Agoran pledge (assuming B doesn't also have a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [s-b] [Notary] Report (null)

2009-05-21 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote: OTOH, pledges have to be public now, so the pledge would have to be published to take effect anyway. Agreeing in ##nomic to a non-pledge private contract or to a public contract (with the fact published later) is a different case. If two players

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [s-b] [Notary] Report (null)

2009-05-21 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: If two players agree privately to a document that includes a clause this is a public contract (with the honest intent of publishing it afterwards), do you have a private contract which later becomes public, or no

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [s-b] [Notary] Report (null)

2009-05-21 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: If two players agree privately to a document that includes a clause this is a public contract (with the honest intent of publishing it afterwards), do you have a private

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [s-b] [Notary] Report (null)

2009-05-21 Thread Alex Smith
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 08:23 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Thu, 21 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote: OTOH, pledges have to be public now, so the pledge would have to be published to take effect anyway. Agreeing in ##nomic to a non-pledge private contract or to a public contract (with the fact

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [s-b] [Notary] Report (null)

2009-05-21 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Alex Smith wrote: On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 08:23 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Thu, 21 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote: OTOH, pledges have to be public now, so the pledge would have to be published to take effect anyway. Agreeing in ##nomic to a non-pledge private contract or

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [s-b] [Notary] Report (null)

2009-05-21 Thread Benjamin Caplan
Geoffrey Spear wrote: ##nomic is an Agoran discussion forum, and has no status at all in B. It should work the same as a-d. ##nomic has a longer history and usage than its official status in Agora. In practice, people discuss more nomics than just Agora there, frequently enough to make intent

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [s-b] [Notary] Report (null)

2009-05-21 Thread Alex Smith
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 14:53 -0500, Benjamin Caplan wrote: Geoffrey Spear wrote: ##nomic is an Agoran discussion forum, and has no status at all in B. It should work the same as a-d. ##nomic has a longer history and usage than its official status in Agora. In practice, people discuss more

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [s-b] [Notary] Report (null)

2009-05-21 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: It's also the equivalent of a PF for at least two other nomics, both of which are now dead. On behalf of One True Agora, I object to the Agoran Ambassador claiming we're dead. It's only a flesh wound!

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [s-b] [Notary] Report (null)

2009-05-21 Thread Alex Smith
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 16:01 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: It's also the equivalent of a PF for at least two other nomics, both of which are now dead. On behalf of One True Agora, I object to the Agoran Ambassador claiming

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [s-b] [Notary] Report (null)

2009-05-20 Thread Benjamin Caplan
Alex Smith wrote: On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 19:01 -0400, Warrigal wrote (in spoon-business): On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote: CONTRACTS - (none) I agree to all documents as public contracts. I call for judgement on the statement Warrigal