Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3736 assigned to omd

2019-06-18 Thread omd
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:23 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > Recent habits, especially for self-filed motions, are "I self-motion > to reconsider, and submit the entirely same judgement except for a > couple clarifying paragraphs" (like I did for 3733) or trivial > mistakes ("I wrote this long argument

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3736 assigned to omd

2019-06-18 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 1:14 PM omd wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 6:11 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Hi omd, > > > > When a Motion to Reconsider is filed, I drop the old arguments > > entirely from the case log, so the old judgement isn't mistaken for > > precedent (there's no objective way of

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3736 assigned to omd

2019-06-18 Thread omd
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 6:11 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > Hi omd, > > When a Motion to Reconsider is filed, I drop the old arguments > entirely from the case log, so the old judgement isn't mistaken for > precedent (there's no objective way of knowing whether motion-filers > are objecting to minor

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3736 assigned to omd

2019-06-17 Thread Kerim Aydin
Hi omd, When a Motion to Reconsider is filed, I drop the old arguments entirely from the case log, so the old judgement isn't mistaken for precedent (there's no objective way of knowing whether motion-filers are objecting to minor portions, or the whole thing, and keeping both gets quite

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3736 assigned to omd

2019-06-16 Thread Jason Cobb
Well that screws up my Oathbreaking CFJ *grumble grumble*. Jason Cobb On 6/17/19 12:43 AM, omd wrote: On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 10:31 PM omd wrote: On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 10:24 PM Aris Merchant wrote: I intend with 2 support to group-file a motion to reconsider. This ruling suggests that a