omd wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Gratuitous: I generally left it implicit and got no complaints.
Do you have your own database set up or would you like me to continue
updating the existing one?
While a database of proposal text + results would be handy (mostly
w
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Gratuitous: I generally left it implicit and got no complaints.
>
> Do you have your own database set up or would you like me to continue
> updating the existing one?
While a database of proposal text + results would be handy (mostly
while brow
omd wrote:
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:24 PM, omd wrote:
Voting results for Proposals 7453-70:
CoE: This should be correct but I forgot to explicitly describe
conditional votes, which may or may not be necessary. Admitted, they
were:
7458 woggle endorse IADoP (scshunt) -> PRESENT
7459 woggl
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On 17 Jun 2013, at 20:19, Sean Hunt wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:24 AM, omd wrote:
>>> 7468 240 O scshunt Fix Bug
>>
>> I submit a proposal identical to this one and threaten to resign all
>> my offices if it does not
On 17 Jun 2013, at 20:19, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:24 AM, omd wrote:
>> 7468 240 O scshunt Fix Bug
>
> I submit a proposal identical to this one and threaten to resign all
> my offices if it does not pass.
Why did anyone vote against that?
-- Walker
5 matches
Mail list logo
