On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
tl;dr: the alleged-NoV quoted by Wooble was ineffective, thus eir
alleged-closing of it was also ineffective.
I should learn not to listen to comex.
Yally wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 22:19, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/5/26 Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com:
NoV: Yally violated R2143, commiting the Class-6 Crime of
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Aaron Goldfein
aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Defendant's Arguments: Regardless of my guilt or innocence on the matter, I
believe that if I am found guilty, it would be fundamentally unjust for any
sentencing other than DISMISS as it is standard for gmail to
2009/5/28 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com:
Then don't submit them in any font. Send plain text, like every other
officer. Many of whom use Gmail with no problems whatsoever.
yes plz
2009/5/28 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
I publish an NoV alleging that Yally violated Rule 2143, committing the
Class-6 Crim of Making My Eyes Bleed, by means of publishing eir most
recent IADoP's report in HTML.
I contest this NoV.
MIME, not HTML. Maybe. Probably.
coppro wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
I wrote:
coppro wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Alex Smith wrote:
I CFJ on this; the issue of whether MIME messages containing both
plaintext and HTML are legal is a rather important one, and I think it
should go through the courts.
I favor this case.
I intend,
Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
TTttPF and (the needed support having been achieved) I set the fine
at 3 Rests.
Fails, you aren't the judge.
R1728(c)(3).
What authorizes me to do that?
coppro wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
TTttPF and (the needed support having been achieved) I set the fine
at 3 Rests.
Fails, you aren't the judge.
R1728(c)(3).
What authorizes me to do that?
Rule 1504, in the section on SILENCE: The judge CAN, with 2 Support,
Ed Murphy wrote:
Rule 1504, in the section on SILENCE: The judge CAN, with 2 Support,
set the fine etc.
I'm not the judge yet, unless I missed the announcement.
coppro wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Rule 1504, in the section on SILENCE: The judge CAN, with 2 Support,
set the fine etc.
I'm not the judge yet, unless I missed the announcement.
R1728(c)(1) allows the judge to do it; R1728(c)(3) allows one of the
supporters to do it, since R1504 doesn't
coppro wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Rule 1504, in the section on SILENCE: The judge CAN, with 2 Support,
set the fine etc.
I'm not the judge yet, unless I missed the announcement.
R1728(c)(1) allows the judge to do it; R1728(c)(3) allows one of the
supporters
coppro wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Alex Smith wrote:
I CFJ on this; the issue of whether MIME messages containing both
plaintext and HTML are legal is a rather important one, and I think it
should go through the courts.
I favor this case.
I intend, with 2 support, to set the fine for this case
I wrote:
coppro wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Alex Smith wrote:
I CFJ on this; the issue of whether MIME messages containing both
plaintext and HTML are legal is a rather important one, and I think it
should go through the courts.
I favor this case.
I intend, with 2 support, to set the fine
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 16:58 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
NoV: Yally violated R2143, commiting the Class-6 Crime of Making My
Eyes Bleed, by publishing a report in HTML (which is not plain text).
Arguments: R101 allows players to participate in the fora. Email format
is not plain text either,
2009/5/26 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 16:58 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
NoV: Yally violated R2143, commiting the Class-6 Crime of Making My
Eyes Bleed, by publishing a report in HTML (which is not plain text).
Arguments: R101 allows players to participate in the fora.
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 16:58 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
NoV: Yally violated R2143, commiting the Class-6 Crime of Making My
Eyes Bleed, by publishing a report in HTML (which is not plain text).
Arguments: R101 allows players to participate in the fora.
Gratuitous: does the message contain a plain-text version without
artifacts? (I can't check...) If so, it's absurd to punish Yally for
including a monospaced HTML version. In Gmail and on iPhone, a
plaintext version would be displayed in variable width font (and it
can't be toggled on
It's as much a standard as the aforementioned email headers.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 26, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com
wrote:
2009/5/26 Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com:
NoV: Yally violated R2143, commiting the Class-6 Crime of Making My
Nope, the conditions are vi=ai -and- vi1
Sent from my iPhone
On May 26, 2009, at 12:15 PM, Quazie quazieno...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com
wrote:
6302 6303 6304 6305 6306 6307 6308 6309 6310 6311
ais523F
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Quazie quazieno...@gmail.com wrote:
COE 6309 passed, ai=vi
VI has to be 1 as well.
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:07, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/5/26 Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com:
NoV: Yally violated R2143, commiting the Class-6 Crime of Making My
Eyes Bleed, by publishing a report in HTML (which is not plain text).
I contest this.
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 20:40 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
Actually, no.
These NoVs were not valid, as they did not specify the rule's power.
NoV: Yally violated R2143, a Power-1 rule, commiting the Class-6 Crime
of Making My
Eyes Bleed, by publishing the IADoP report in some nonsense MIME
2009/5/26 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 20:40 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
Actually, no.
These NoVs were not valid, as they did not specify the rule's power.
NoV: Yally violated R2143, a Power-1 rule, commiting the Class-6 Crime
of Making My
Eyes Bleed, by publishing
2009/5/26 comex com...@gmail.com:
I support. I want a precedent in favor of dual-format messages for
previously stated reasons. (Considering that the text/plain was first, is
there any mail client where this is an actual problem? Why don't you like
it ehird?)
My eyes bled because he chose
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/5/26 comex com...@gmail.com:
I support. I want a precedent in favor of dual-format messages for
previously stated reasons. (Considering that the text/plain was first, is
there any mail client where this
2009/5/26 comex com...@gmail.com:
the rest of the report follows. Only after the plain-text version
(and 3 lines of multipart header at the top) is the HTML version.
Rule 2143 requires that reports be published in plain text, not *only*
in plain text.
MIME != plain text
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/5/26 comex com...@gmail.com:
the rest of the report follows. Only after the plain-text version
(and 3 lines of multipart header at the top) is the HTML version.
Rule 2143 requires that reports be
27 matches
Mail list logo
