Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2500 assigned to Rodlen

2009-05-15 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: You are correct. However, the answer to Do we need to consider the difference between regular and Agoran days? is yes. The only difference is that regular days start at midnight local time, which gives at least 6 different

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2500 assigned to Rodlen

2009-05-15 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: You are correct. However, the answer to Do we need to consider the difference between regular and Agoran days? is yes. The only difference is that regular days start at midnight

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2500 assigned to Rodlen

2009-05-15 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: No I think the difference is that days as in span from an event are 24 hours from the event.  -G. That's the difference between a span and an epoch, though, not between days and Agoran days. An Agoran day is 24 hours,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2500 assigned to Rodlen

2009-05-15 Thread Sean Hunt
Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: No I think the difference is that days as in span from an event are 24 hours from the event. -G. That's the difference between a span and an epoch, though, not between days and Agoran days.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2500 assigned to Rodlen

2009-05-15 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: No I think the difference is that days as in span from an event are 24 hours from the event.  -G. That's the difference between a span and an epoch, though, not between

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2500 assigned to Rodlen

2009-05-14 Thread Kerim Aydin
In Thu, 14 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote: Rodlen wrote: CFJ 2500 Judgment: FALSE. Yes, yes we do. See my recent judgment on CFJ2501. I intend, with two support, to appeal this judgment. Wooble's arguments as used by judge Rodlen do not conflict with yours in CFJ 2501. -G.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2500 assigned to Rodlen

2009-05-14 Thread Sean Hunt
Kerim Aydin wrote: In Thu, 14 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote: Rodlen wrote: CFJ 2500 Judgment: FALSE. Yes, yes we do. See my recent judgment on CFJ2501. I intend, with two support, to appeal this judgment. Wooble's arguments as used by judge Rodlen do not conflict with yours in CFJ 2501.