--- On Tue, 11/5/10, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
coppro wrote:
I sit up.
ITYM I stand up.
Last I checked, players couldn't stand by announcement;
has that changed? (However, given that we're apparently
in an emergency session, it's unlikely to make much of a
difference given that
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Alex Smith
callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
--- On Tue, 11/5/10, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
coppro wrote:
I sit up.
ITYM I stand up.
Last I checked, players couldn't stand by announcement;
has that changed? (However, given that we're
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
You can stand up if you judge a disinterested case in the same message.
Which means that the CotC can pretty much judge every case.
Wooble wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
You can stand up if you judge a disinterested case in the same message.
Which means that the CotC can pretty much judge every case.
Until people start specifying a non-zero interest index and/or
submitting
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
You can stand up if you judge a disinterested case in the same message.
Which means that the CotC can pretty much judge every case.
If e abuses it we can submit our cases as
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
=== CFJ 2797 (Interest Index = 0)
If the proposal entitled Reassign the name passed, it would
successfully null-amend a Rule with Power 1.7.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:26 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
=== CFJ 2797 (Interest Index = 0)
If the proposal entitled Reassign the name passed, it would
successfully
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I interpreted it 'null-amend' as 'an amendment with no substantiative
change', which would still be prohibited if it could exist.
Ah, I disagree with you on this point. Power Controls Mutability
explicitly does not prohibit
coppro wrote:
I sit up.
ITYM I stand up.
I award myself two capacitors.
This should be reasonably unambiguous, as the only other CFJ you've
attempted to judge this month was 2790 (II=0) on the 4th.
9 matches
Mail list logo
