Accepted. I'll clean up that part of the report - I'm doing it manually
right now, but I really should automate it. Sorry about that.
~ Roujo
On 2013-07-29 5:14 AM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 Jul 2013, at 03:52, Jonathan Rouillard jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com
wrote:
It might be because of Rule 2378, Court Protector. Since the AaL
seems to be the backup CotC, maybe you wanted to tag him in your
reports.
~ Roujo
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Roujo wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Ed Murphy
On 12 March 2013 03:20, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Admitted, it was 11 Mar 13. (Obviously I missed editing that part
before sending it out.)
I just didn't want to consider the cosmological implications of
ratifying that statement.
FKA441344 wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
[...]
Recent events
[...]
Mon 28 May 07:52:13 3221 initiated by FKA441344
Fri 1 Jun 23:23:08 3208 judged FALSE by ais523
Sun 3 Jun 00:51:38 BobTHJ registers
Sun 3 Jun 17:22:48 3212 assigned to omd
Tanner Swett wrote:
I stand.
You can't do that directly, you have to sit and then wait for the
next rotation.
Tanner Swett wrote:
Come to think of it, I sit, and set my judicial rank to 3.
Judicial ranks no longer exist (they were repealed along with
interest indices).
2009/5/19 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 13:37 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/5/19 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com:
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Ed Murphy
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
Gratuitous arguments: I identified the contract as the one named UNDEAD.
If that contract doesn't exist, clearly the intent fails.
If there's one that has that name, but don't know it exists, have you
clearly identified it?
If there's more than one that
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ais523 brought up another possibility so let me add: I am unaware of
the existence any pledge with the above identifier (merely backs up the
accepted COE on behalf of Murphy). -Goethe
You did not address the claim that
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
? I just did ?
nevermind.
On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:01, Charles Reiss wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 22:22, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[snip]
2223 ais523UNDEAD PT ends 10/23
05:02:46
Claim of Error: ais523 is not a party to UNDEAD and it is not a
pledge, so this case was not
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:01, Charles Reiss wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 22:22, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
2223 ais523UNDEAD PT ends 10/23 05:02:46
Claim of Error: ais523 is not a party to UNDEAD and it
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 15:59, Charles Reiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I harvest 2204, the number of a recent CFJ, for 2 WRV.
I harvest 2214, the number of a recent CFJ, for 2 WRV (using X for 2s).
I harvest 2210, the number of a recent CFJ, for 2 WRV (using X for 2s).
Er, if that last harvest
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ais523 wrote:
CoE: This does not contain a list of active Monsters.
Denied. Activity is not defined for the Monster, thus the list was
empty, thus the report was accurate by omission.
I would disagree with you there, but I
comex wrote:
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ais523 wrote:
CoE: This does not contain a list of active Monsters.
Denied. Activity is not defined for the Monster, thus the list was
empty, thus the report was accurate by omission.
I would disagree with
tusho wrote:
2008/7/19 Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ehrid (aka Teh Cltohed Mna ...)
CoE: No longer.
Please explain this more clearly.
OscarMeyr wrote:
I initiate a criminal CFJ against comex, for violating Rule 1504 by
not publishing eir apology as per the sentence from CFJ 1942 within
the time frame specified in R1504. (See evidence above.)
Already prosecuted via CFJ 2022. Want to retract this one?
Is it just me,
On Jun 22, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
OscarMeyr wrote:
I initiate a criminal CFJ against comex, for violating Rule 1504 by
not publishing eir apology as per the sentence from CFJ 1942 within
the time frame specified in R1504. (See evidence above.)
Already prosecuted via CFJ 2022.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:43 AM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's now well past tomorrow.
You know, I had already published my apology when you sent this message.
On Jun 22, 2008, at 12:30 PM, comex wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:43 AM, Benjamin Schultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's now well past tomorrow.
You know, I had already published my apology when you sent this
message.
Actually, my message fell into a grey area, and got sent out
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I STILL don't recall seeing an apology for CFJ 1942, and I see nothing in
the business archive at agoranomic from comex indicating otherwise. Would
someone please verify my memory, lest I file a trivially INNOCENT
21 matches
Mail list logo
