On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
On Jul 9, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
The candidates for Promotor are omd and Machiavelli.
I ENDORSE the current Promotor.
Perhaps it would be clearest to say I ENDORSE the person who is Promotor as
of
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
On Jul 9, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
The candidates for Promotor are omd and Machiavelli.
I ENDORSE the current Promotor.
Perhaps it would be
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
It's *evaluated* at the end of the voting period, but that could easily
mean at the end of the voting period, evaluate who was the 'current promotor'
at the time the vote was cast. I would personally read it that way.
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Kerim Aydin wrote:
So is I vote for the current promotor a conditional vote, or an instantly
resolved reference that's a non-conditional vote? I'd say the former.
Sorry, I meant the latter - I think the above is a non-conditional vote.
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
It's *evaluated* at the end of the voting period, but that could easily
mean at the end of the voting period, evaluate who was the 'current
promotor'
at the time the vote
On Jul 9, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
The candidates for Promotor are omd and Machiavelli.
I ENDORSE the current Promotor.
Perhaps it would be clearest to say I ENDORSE the person who is Promotor as of
the time this vote is cast? It's not clear that the phrase the current
6 matches
Mail list logo
