On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:00, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Roger Hickspidge...@gmail.com wrote:
-
2 ehird
2 Quazie
2 Sgeo
1 w1n5t0n*
?06/29:001 19:38 Wooble C-Walker 2170 3 nickname confusion
(2620)
-time of
Ed Murphy wrote:
woggle wrote:
The second NoV (which wasn't on 19 May) named the crime correctly. The
first did not.
Does this invalidate CFJ 2537?
No it does not. The second NoV, on May 25, was valid (BobTHJ has yet to
post a notice to that effect though).
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 23:59, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
woggle wrote:
The second NoV (which wasn't on 19 May) named the crime correctly. The
first did not.
Does this invalidate CFJ 2537?
No it does not. The second NoV, on May 25, was valid (BobTHJ has yet to
woggle wrote:
!05/19:001 17:16 comex Wooble 22038forgery
CoE: This notice was invalid. The crime it named, Forgery, is not
specified by the rules.
The NoV named Endorsing Forgery, which is specified by the rules; it's
only the report that omitted Endorsing.
On 5/25/09 5:28 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
woggle wrote:
!05/19:001 17:16 comex Wooble 22038forgery
CoE: This notice was invalid. The crime it named, Forgery, is not
specified by the rules.
The NoV named Endorsing Forgery, which is specified by the rules;
woggle wrote:
The second NoV (which wasn't on 19 May) named the crime correctly. The
first did not.
Does this invalidate CFJ 2537?
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 11:17 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:11, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
BobTHJ wrote:
Rests (* = Fugitive)
-
4 ais523
1 coppro
2 ehird
3 Sgeo
2 w1n5t0n
CoE: w1n5t0n was recently deregistered for inactivity,
7 matches
Mail list logo
