Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Possibly Registrar] Census

2013-08-07 Thread Charles Walker
On 7 Aug 2013, at 01:26, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 20:24 -0400, Max Schutz wrote: wait we have to re-register again Probably not. Wooble thinks we do, but I'm not sure if anyone else agrees with em. One common problem with nomic is that people disagree as

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Possibly Registrar] Census

2013-08-06 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:32 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone please give me a counterargument to When created, switches have their default values == new switches have their default values? Rule 1586. http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-discussion@agoranomic.org/msg26317.html

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Possibly Registrar] Census

2013-08-06 Thread Max Schutz
wait we have to re-register again On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 20:14 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote: I register. I also register, on the very remote chance that this actually does anything. -- ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Possibly Registrar] Census

2013-08-06 Thread Craig Daniel
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Max Schutz maxschutz...@gmail.com wrote: wait we have to re-register again No. Well, not unless Wooble.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Possibly Registrar] Census

2013-08-06 Thread Alex Smith
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 20:24 -0400, Max Schutz wrote: wait we have to re-register again Probably not. Wooble thinks we do, but I'm not sure if anyone else agrees with em. One common problem with nomic is that people disagree as to what the state of things is. -- ais523

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Possibly Registrar] Census

2013-08-05 Thread Charles Walker
On 5 August 2013 20:49, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Geoffrey Spear woo...@nomictools.com wrote: An alternate viewpoint: CoE since ratification will probably be fixed in the next week: in the normal universe, this is incorrect for obvious reasons. Can someone

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Possibly Registrar] Census

2013-08-05 Thread Craig Daniel
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On 5 August 2013 20:49, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Geoffrey Spear woo...@nomictools.com wrote: An alternate viewpoint: CoE since ratification will probably be fixed in the next

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Possibly Registrar] Census

2013-08-05 Thread omd
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On 5 August 2013 20:49, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Geoffrey Spear woo...@nomictools.com wrote: An alternate viewpoint: CoE since ratification will probably be fixed in the next

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Possibly Registrar] Census

2013-08-05 Thread omd
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:32 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone please give me a counterargument to When created, switches have their default values == new switches have their default values? Rule 1586. By the way, the rules didn't actually say when created, switches have their

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Possibly Registrar] Census

2013-08-05 Thread Charles Walker
On 5 August 2013 21:35, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:32 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone please give me a counterargument to When created, switches have their default values == new switches have their default values? Rule 1586. By the way, the rules